[alto] Interested in reviewing unified-props? And other drafts as well

[Vijay Gurbani <[e-mail]>]

Dear Luis: Are you still interested in reviewing unified-props?  If so, can
you please let Jan and me know as soon as possible?  The draft needs an
in-depth WGLC review by Oct. 9.

All: Since my posting asking for volunteers to review unified-props [1], I
have received no offers.  Considering that we have performance-metrics
draft and the path-vector draft that need to be reviewed for WGLC, the lack
of review volunteers do not bode well.

One logical conclusion that can be drawn if we do not get any review offers
is that the WG does not have the energy to finish existing work.  This begs
the question on why recharter ALTO if we cannot meet the current deadlines.

A subset of you are organizing weekly meetings to further the work on
drafts and re-chartering.  My advice would be that effort spent on those
meetings should be redirected (or at least shared) with reviewing existing
drafts so we can finish up the work and get ready for re-chartering.

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/cWi2YNk6odQ_hL-0oF9GRxKyYqs/

Cheers,

- vijay