[alto] A virtual session at IETF 100?

Qiao Xiang <xiangq27@gmail.com> Wed, 20 September 2017 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <xiangq27@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A88F134212 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dVZoMZnQdzMK for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07B891320D8 for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id i131so3496922wma.1 for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/E7hIOXNoVCuAaTUV4btCNU6Hq4egY3LFvo21Gz5TTM=; b=JAUcuMN7c08kmqMqKrW582u1TnM3JJviE7A2Q9M1uTTNWP2YqVADHAkCJMuQfwxgq5 Semyp9lXw7hhDJTGaXVtYNL84LQnOEnOxv7ggxBTjI6YJdrR705hzk1JsBqPIKigZSi/ 1/JwDlg3sZkLXPkMbBXtyK93vUB+u0ad6RWU5GeVunps75m9nCjNrbacDeUX8uascafI Y/oU5FSzIxwU8zefZnTWCg7LDW5+hTBeKICv3PncyINfHPR48/dzVy8eZfnAsuS/RnMY OiA+AsMhHEzANWyoko4U+Zway0PecZTRC7RxJ5hX2J1h6pcpg8tKjw7Clik7XXrtoA0m taGg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/E7hIOXNoVCuAaTUV4btCNU6Hq4egY3LFvo21Gz5TTM=; b=HUFsJ/OSLs4LnmrxK3yofO6K8R8Y/i2r6fnvfUlVZMCDsVEgBCRJIjAuqCysxH89bJ XvI5GaAs6QVKd4UDoY98CMGqV+1hnnz96zpYyCVqRTpTn3VADlKA4nI3jh9YteZGur+w mqw9LH8pRAeCP8VC5C0VajF/ZiVxSZPeNa+P1YvhZFGblqysLOpRm9eyfiHpaSAGQ72y N1IgdrkOG/MVKqcNkhSdZfOLkFQOoKBHydipd+BxwuoNfPXVlY/ZNpNy07M1mIeek83m EJpVq3WMa9mTt++6PfZH8udxCkjFGaR/FQg/AysBrTvGMz96ZsCuOOO+zAzXVX1Y0nFX cObA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhTMhazJ2gkTTq3zCHBRPbnVRt6GK+nDC7wUFAKmw7Orgmsre6d czt1l1ZXXUf/kaWiQaSrcN/PciaEE3q8FAyg7so=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCohbUaBRsTUC2+Y86hmnQIcgE9KRhfbZcEPW8AGMC95amCEzdIMlZZGjeFB9I8/X/IQpbm/r9pP7uEF+JEAU8=
X-Received: by with SMTP id s13mr20169edb.248.1505941419508; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Qiao Xiang <xiangq27@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:03:18 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOB1xS9GHZKY7SYZmmNWqSTn7K67fyCz9Jv_rRS9qFP05deA_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vijay.gurbani@nokia-bell-labs.com>, Jan Seedorf <jan.seedorf@hft-stuttgart.de>
Cc: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c4e6e5cc8bd0559a54ff0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/BGqMBl37lfzG_xzdDxHVEgGwVqA>
Subject: [alto] A virtual session at IETF 100?
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:03:42 -0000

Hi Jan, Vijay and all WG members,

I received an email from IETF saying we will not hold a session at IETF
100. Am I to correct to presume this means no f2f meeting at IETF 100, but
not for a virtual meeting?

I am asking this because I recall that by the end of the ALTO session at
IETF 99 we agree that we would have a virtual meeting at IETF 100. I am
wondering do we have a tentative schedule on organizing this virtual
session? If there is anything that requires the efforts from the WG member,
I would be glad to help out.

And the following are some quick updates from the drafts I am contributing

(1) For draft-xiang-alto-exascale-network-optimization-03 and
draft-gao-alto-routing-state-abstraction-06, we are making good progress on
the system design and implementation. We recently submitted a paper to the
INDIS workshop, and will do a full demonstration of multi-domain resource
orchestration at SuperComputing 2017 in Denver. We will update these two
drafts to report our latest design details in a couple of weeks.

(2) For draft-gao-alto-fcs-03, Jensen, Kai and I have been discussing on
how to address the remaining design challenges. We haven't reached any
design decisions yet, but will do that by the end of October.

Qiao Xiang
Postdoctoral Fellow,
Department of Computer Science,
Yale University