[alto] Second WGLC for cost-calendar

Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com> Mon, 11 February 2019 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF69E13104F for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:54:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CbUw3R2BZpNA for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 353BB130E94 for <alto@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id f9so9277257eds.10 for <alto@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:54:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sNZKJmCErRxDVUUL9w7Wamo0h4MxovbCsGn+F4mGhJo=; b=A7MlH5Ik9QSPanodsyJ0Cc+UfVWJUNQ/elPLLoCwkg647j5NHa7mWR14MvF6y6l2Ig O+YrKf172gf/l9g+qYXis+l7dWiPy5uAblxm1pvSbGD/LP3OsUPwAlVwo88zffDA5P4a 618n6eI0I0evy3U4Dy6DuYbykanPWjK9Ljk5ixOfEvcvAZgicGvzmElUCSUZChXvVKHK 5CdN0NmAFWt422lUs1IaOo6gT6z2Df7ARfq1iwro8PtQady274QIHpN6E1XWB1i9GAQA /VEnjosqL4tCc8ksBbXYpJA2a0giLP6LqA9fbeWiOYeK4Y9rSb49Mbj2vIJ5ryY6LgcN aRIw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sNZKJmCErRxDVUUL9w7Wamo0h4MxovbCsGn+F4mGhJo=; b=k5j8yBn/oKeIb4n1mESrxJpl6FgmM5uJkEFtdf2wc9tT1K4ejCkjSAKCmiB9Ty05Q+ yE4c9aqMjXbDdQ+CJUSa+PMxyY4vomSCMY5N9GzJ6E++BE6gazGTVhUSnbVY7jn6OHo8 WyqKMexbCZvZfmvy+8KD5intdfV48KZ9jottGH27Ary99sIx5qQhzEpYdC4jZOpdawX2 QkQzExrmonPF8jyHjt5OjnBBkAv/wi8Q1FrlLeVdBg/rERwMqrtFUuVVTafHSmZl2OXH FX5I43ReV94IHAbLhyrI0MWY1Lfk4kNj0UawtXgvZ1Y7zKk2uYhahH++k0rzDC38Obk2 cW3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZ/d92Yta5lxwfeNtK/Uf6Jadx+iQJ0wpCaV3TGUNLGXCkMcd3P YQjWdZS0dut27NZdiR0esMWJ5KU/YwjRs8vPf9KrPhVY
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaPZ/LhEvuewR31FLJE2/A/IsCR17uKpP+xDXzVdPgNt8A0FeH54/nc8pei1f/K69ENJDZsL6mKbs5JaoOmZ8c=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:e60a:: with SMTP id y10mr11190968edm.8.1549900466855; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:54:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:54:26 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMMTW_KtVLEo4RYtxVAo8+MEvApAPVLPPQ62ACV_dOU2NWJhfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: alto@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c3a81b0581a0527c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/CVrdXuniggnJMxJySJlwhbxQgyA>
Subject: [alto] Second WGLC for cost-calendar
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:54:32 -0000

Folks: During the IESG review of cost-calendar, substantial comments were
made that requires a second WGLC for this draft.  Pursuant to the second
WGLC, we will resend the draft to the IESG.

The IESG comments are captured in [1].  The authors of cost-calendar have
revised the draft to address these comments and the new draft (version -10)
is available at [2].

This email serves as a second WGLC for cost-calendar and will run from Mon,
Feb 11 2019 to Mon, Feb 25 2019.  During this two week period, please
examine carefully the revised version and post any comments or discussions
to the list, even if you have no comments, a simple email to the list
saying that you have examined the changes and the draft is ready to proceed
is helpful.

To help you save time, you can examine the diffs between -09 and -10 at [3].

Thank you.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/ballot/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/
[3] https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-10.txt