Re: [alto] Second WGLC for cost-calendar

Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com> Thu, 21 February 2019 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF04F1310AD for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:15:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SVbgiy3Mnd9r for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 937C21310A2 for <alto@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id m35so19982218ede.10 for <alto@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:15:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0h+mic6c4MWDnFSaE+VTm+gfRFJrUfIaxz4Hj2h7lJ0=; b=GXQfDYxGD8O6J2lhpIVLcaTP4DiJ+4qxOvJb0IqA6TAFqeZhPQoAHmt8B0/wDqszqe bn4AlFkqJyDma5MG7C51GBy1MCdTVnDraydRa0D9B+SU9wLG/RXPPNcxoiuNoivqTo8u 3Gk3gKB28uriJLTVlWwNwqI6/KBMB4DC5TlJ5pwNu8yH7zkK6F0gnVzXqJKTC16A77Ja EdVJJezF9ymeYTbYFEntypanDbNbIyRrZCQSRzH7Gnz1GYnCXYCt1aVZAAhPzyNd3k+6 +oDi5vC1AOjt4g6zET7obn8kEX9za6LUDxmsXyQ9Jve3x85hQPZUUF+tPiBJ4YW8d/o+ y9jg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=0h+mic6c4MWDnFSaE+VTm+gfRFJrUfIaxz4Hj2h7lJ0=; b=ascKKl+J3pK44y7AvMtf//xQRZehcYCdDZzGkX7AfAPcoonjr31OnDxdFK2zBy6IAm kv1J+rQCOz6sqhmICRJwvAv299hn07EPmT+YeOTNvzY8CtIrH9V3lRdeTIKWrve2K2o/ TCm2KRCh0hF4OO2O0hdpTRY4CsCrcTLXx1jdBpHGFHFRx3t0SMJrliBPjDt7QxXi6REo GJXEamPxKXvJuzAbM87I6wvoa7OZe/LX4dRBIuK+qn9cwka55jdYbbvr7gBtxqRxzpdF xLCeSfB0TbWMfTDQfkrm53KvZ0yrX19xpMPLYtZTf+QNnEdr7A9mCaRevK7dPx7olpDB U5Vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYZW0QxGJ/OsxDWtWkBzaeypcbIOXO0vmJYUmVeVSwe4iih4U7j tbCy2FpQCbxY8nViVFvunjDz02NXbEX4TWK1iFAMyQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaHdtXRToKPgWo+rdCmf9dz/1d3+7suuzU6KtM3qQ5LZhypztgIuI0U/RIPcWhmNoTuXrRX/+VN45OiAe6M4sE=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:db19:: with SMTP id t25mr14042031eds.177.1550772952606; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:15:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMMTW_KtVLEo4RYtxVAo8+MEvApAPVLPPQ62ACV_dOU2NWJhfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMTW_KtVLEo4RYtxVAo8+MEvApAPVLPPQ62ACV_dOU2NWJhfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 12:15:40 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMMTW_+r50k2++8FBMeYsC-w9L2ocp0O5ebiB7OL8ENfOfugJg@mail.gmail.com>
To: alto@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f7aacb05826b7667"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/Cg8r81ikbXOrXuFmdGOwUREAZ54>
Subject: Re: [alto] Second WGLC for cost-calendar
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:15:57 -0000

Folks: The WGLC period is about to expire and so far no one has posted
anything to the list.  It is imperative that we have some folks looking at
the drafts as we move them along.  I do realize everyone is busy, please
kindly take a few minutes to look at the diffs and post anything that seems
remiss to the list.

Thank you.

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:54 AM Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>;
wrote:

> Folks: During the IESG review of cost-calendar, substantial comments were
> made that requires a second WGLC for this draft.  Pursuant to the second
> WGLC, we will resend the draft to the IESG.
>
> The IESG comments are captured in [1].  The authors of cost-calendar have
> revised the draft to address these comments and the new draft (version -10)
> is available at [2].
>
> This email serves as a second WGLC for cost-calendar and will run from
> Mon, Feb 11 2019 to Mon, Feb 25 2019.  During this two week period, please
> examine carefully the revised version and post any comments or discussions
> to the list, even if you have no comments, a simple email to the list
> saying that you have examined the changes and the draft is ready to proceed
> is helpful.
>
> To help you save time, you can examine the diffs between -09 and -10 at
> [3].
>
> Thank you.
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/ballot/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/
> [3]
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-10.txt
>