[alto] Implementation status
Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com> Fri, 14 August 2020 20:07 UTC
Return-Path: <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088A13A073D for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ko9YjL9ctRY9 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85FAA3A05DE for <alto@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id bo3so11137697ejb.11 for <alto@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ENSFs7/Q/x6JesKeqEk9egnoW9qNgOviA1Izkay4OM4=; b=ViwDXwmt3ZB5Y5gsyufZ0M9xJLNRGDdWo1Lw4lm9kgEwq0Q/WnAotu+vlO9cLvZyBR I8/Q/QLII5y09xFTaatUJXDA8Gggzr2QeZDK2fsts3+aEna/UVukV9ohBhOFVpKqySve iwb5lGB3NggsYd3/9hX9vUMtCcz3arE/j85FbeRvWOsuDg+yE577NV+HfhD5/MtAH7WX 1YzNcqa3X1z8VbdfDJWWYA7tUYNmgBmQjJLIWZ2Jk6TEaU2O36mm0Y243M8rwQhPgE7a 2KhMaVBwLTXN9AZI82Q29QRE9e77U6kkmED/k9xEMR3SFIamurfQQE5th+CseRvTFMh+ TXuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ENSFs7/Q/x6JesKeqEk9egnoW9qNgOviA1Izkay4OM4=; b=ooGvj4qI6hjhBmRYFChCFntdBTJvXxa+X99rs7xuooNK7Ie8TDcWy8AEWlkT7mXo5A 9wRZpy6vtej9nejuJUoArinF1MeFpkOdSiUB5vzvI70TT73dV0nAawzpZwfBilfq52y1 tFHp+nrNGPokLl9OeKl070b9LRERf9u6mtzQ30D8m6fUX8+0KiBgClWW2bhtQx2SJ+hp eO206FHMSIN5JmYX45xuC9IsGzlVkyNVpKB72yoQLze7LknOF0OD6SSa0dDei54WTv6m j424KRDW88EzNgJmWq6QRW9QggC51WluzqtaV0Odf//g5XYtmmypLss3NlM9jGG98bTr whSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533yPvoiG6b1Hj+U2SNAU1ALsB7Hyutg79U578OJawN+b82g371g JS80Il4A0+4vNqoGr985lEWnI4OpSB2eVba6ImdyN3xt8xrK7g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySwRwMYu9L76A1UqRrW25gaZYPNKXd+QyVkB8AWqO/mU1hVplJ2Ua9d5JYC8TRbn4WRUYq+9eDyIwqbFqkDHc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7255:: with SMTP id ds21mr4271664ejc.44.1597435652759; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:06:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMMTW_KxSrQzxbtwYceMAgkdaadhWzq24p_5qQueYUNUS3hBxg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a2663f05acdbf8b7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/DXCKvxvoZVdY7NlafWRYkq2W8-4>
Subject: [alto] Implementation status
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 20:07:36 -0000
All: I want to draw your attention to RFC 7942. It talks about an optional section called "Implementation Considerations". This section lists any known implementation of the protocol and contact people, etc. For some of the ALTO drafts, it may not be a bad idea to include such a section. RFC 7942 [1] provides more information on the structure and expectations of this section. [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7942 Thanks, - vijay
- [alto] Implementation status Vijay Gurbani