IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [alto] Need to move SSE to WGLC, but ...

Dawn Chan <dawn_chen_f@hotmail.com> Sat, 16 June 2018 06:36 UTC

Return-Path: <dawn_chen_f@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD02130DC4 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 23:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.125
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.125 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cx6lpn-6FWNI for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 23:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092003104.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.3.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB401277D2 for <alto@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 23:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=++0FBUDxCABRm84mpubRNEKZeSTFmlvTZttVQYBAbME=; b=juCjgQ8LFvTrXycQyAvkumyA3d7C3MIwIAcBU26TwLKWy5TqgKmzgJ44HD2kEMQWuT17KxXju/KO7UnHYSgu2I2yNg8t2zqr1Eq27pDpDuMtpaxUYlYF7O/QZqDnlfc36dMJzqTXq6MIYQhismPAurBuzc8k4fdYcqEr79hESfrMOZiwXZ4Pgrcx4kEVvYPl6W8xpwJIk7A2kakJhDBM6uUJAuS2yTyRQRQnBlpw+ojf5aVzBV6rDiFyYOg48JC+S65CzJ0yJMVCWs+tW3ztdbPq++DlKl9Ca7mKiardk87l0U/Srq+FxUfDBR/zamtWfiURe28xccKRVVorBa5A6Q==
Received: from BL2NAM02FT033.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.76.53) by BL2NAM02HT199.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.76.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.20.863.11; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 06:36:50 +0000
Received: from BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.76.54) by BL2NAM02FT033.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.77.163) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.20.863.11 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 06:36:50 +0000
Received: from BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::60e1:2316:9c1a:4d36]) by BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::60e1:2316:9c1a:4d36%3]) with mapi id 15.20.0863.016; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 06:36:50 +0000
From: Dawn Chan <dawn_chen_f@hotmail.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vijay.gurbani@nokia.com>
CC: "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>, "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu>
Thread-Topic: [alto] Need to move SSE to WGLC, but ...
Thread-Index: AQHT/zn+YiZeNZXmJkOa25SzsmP4KKRYWasAgAJo2yOAAGmsAIAAgpaAgAWrSICAASBFgA==
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 06:36:50 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR02MB1202B02AB0AF9D15DA387CDCB5730@BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <eff0f53c-aac0-f74d-e4cb-0e741cfe0a0b@nokia.com> <CANUuoLqqPtU5CWKC4GmOsrsUxaL+DpsS5A9FH=qOkO_z_j50PA@mail.gmail.com> <BLUPR02MB12020D622905ED35146439E6B5780@BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <083fe4a0-cb0a-090b-b1cd-ded0bb968d23@nokia.com> <CANUuoLohgNJTsEuurgXX=+bJP0Ee75RNYHRy4UBCSZ2sW6YsxA@mail.gmail.com> <9373da59-ca6f-c094-e204-21fdf29e1e87@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <9373da59-ca6f-c094-e204-21fdf29e1e87@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: HK0PR03CA0020.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:203:2e::32) To BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:52bf::16)
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:99437EFCED9B1F5C2CD77C280B195EB64293CEA153917F1F2AD4F8FAE13A55D3; UpperCasedChecksum:4BACCCCFA5983696CF99E12A3F401433F84EAAC9DC96CBC60314050851E17EE4; SizeAsReceived:7872; Count:50
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [P+Reo1ubJpXJpQ4CZ363iVh/ob6Ju2GB]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BL2NAM02HT199; 7:Q5utUp6lrVxNbvHPMw2pZgwJIUs8jEXz4Aeuy1+z9sePlViRKnVYS7woyHs0dF53Q6/5W/SUkkds2JYax1TbLMggDn91rHSyUx7eX7IDDLXDkSbNBLTq4IXLK6C58JmOfBnTAQo3DV+CUxr7/sEA5IUrYphDJPCHYhhk57V7tn/hfQW6/lI00Xeh4RSVmpq/j0/2tcblkAANiqqjbPXYXV8s2/u+QvYaXhi3mB31LYSxuiLmjY0bagsffP5/TmRk
x-incomingheadercount: 50
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:(109105607167333); BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1601125500)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:BL2NAM02HT199;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL2NAM02HT199:
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:BL2NAM02HT199; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BL2NAM02HT199;
x-forefront-prvs: 0705EB1700
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(189003)(199004)(81156014)(6246003)(8936002)(74316002)(82202002)(6916009)(9686003)(33656002)(20460500001)(14454004)(3660700001)(6436002)(87572001)(11346002)(55016002)(2900100001)(446003)(476003)(486006)(105586002)(53546011)(386003)(99286004)(106356001)(59450400001)(6506007)(102836004)(6306002)(8676002)(229853002)(68736007)(3280700002)(6346003)(8656006)(97736004)(25786009)(7696005)(26005)(76176011)(83332001)(1720100001)(5250100002)(104016004)(11609785009)(5660300001)(86362001)(966005)(4326008)(93886005)(305945005)(53366004)(54906003)(53376002)(73972006)(15852004)(4068875011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2NAM02HT199; H:BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: hotmail.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=dawn_chen_f@hotmail.com;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: k8dEABHXrIFi5PTuA9ZgKWDtJvOQVNDBTatW40Nmwm2TpnBA8CQ8gG1RIZINg4nWeS1aFCAZ2wqCF15Rx0oOHNKYhYKN820hVNJmJL3ftRVhtsRpwms4ZRDBgoBkHGWxl4cz4YI9NFb8WUlcMktI6CJgz4iWDV65JS4yZwXfhn7ONoV8/iZn8dq2v+MS1oy5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3A09BA28AE327A4EB83B7A64D2921CDC@namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: d4d70346-2c10-4f39-8c00-e767963926d9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 632ba615-bdd4-47eb-dc09-08d5d3538a73
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: d4d70346-2c10-4f39-8c00-e767963926d9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Jun 2018 06:36:50.6362 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL2NAM02HT199
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/DjXQwmmYCPR8DzU4ffetu4kyJQE>
Subject: Re: [alto] Need to move SSE to WGLC, but ...
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 06:36:55 -0000

Hi Vijay,

A new version of SSE is already submitted to the WG. We can move things forward.

Thanks,
Dawn
> On 15 Jun 2018, at 9:24 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> Richard, Dawn: As per [1], we need to move SSE ahead.
> 
> Since the posting of [1], there has been some discussion on the
> remaining open issue with SSE; this discussion is captured in [2].
> 
> So, I think it is time to move the work ahead with the consensus reached
> in [2].
> 
> Please issue a new version of the SSE draft by Monday.  As soon as it
> appears in the IETF archives, Jan and I will start a WGLC on it.
> Further discussions --- if any --- on the consensus reached in [2], can
> be held as part of WGLC.
> 
> [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg03686.html
> [2] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg03684.html
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> On 06/11/2018 05:50 PM, Y. Richard Yang wrote:
>> Hi Vijay, all
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:03 AM Vijay K. Gurbani
>> <vijay.gurbani@nokia.com <mailto:vijay.gurbani@nokia.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>    Dawn: Yes, pipelining is another good reason to send the response in
>>    the update stream control service.
>> 
>>    This, and the other reasons I indicate in a different thread [1]
>>    makes me prefer option 2.
>> 
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Richard
>>  
>> 
>>    [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/current/msg03687.html
> 
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani / vijay.gurbani@nokia.com
> Network Data Science, Nokia Networks
> Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email