Re: [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16: (with COMMENT)
"Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu> Sun, 23 February 2020 22:48 UTC
Return-Path: <yang.r.yang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7883A1142; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:48:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KHtMspcQTLO1; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:48:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-f46.google.com (mail-vs1-f46.google.com [209.85.217.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D4573A1140; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:48:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-f46.google.com with SMTP id c18so4585523vsq.7; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:48:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SiU7BsOYqhmPphj5vgG3VNEZIzgZPq867g77f6rsLBE=; b=LW47N3S9LcS7WWqzvvv0oauJKLV18fCeRhjga/66fnHgPPE67vxCVibqfcnfEv7hyQ f9flTD7bX3qTm4zS9tEaVc96VIB6z0M7F84R6G0FUA/NFo80X706qOgeEIpHGvLOUFPc SAv8HJUCWZQAR1WxZUQbTd1UYPGtDnecDY+b3k8R4o/XH4I/F9F/ecynXfw3HxI4KvIo me+p9EC/xivscVGt2xA6YIH5A3KIy6YrdN0dEYMlrfhFEsXY60MrV8qQZHf0im/qTV0Z OuvQCIcv3ghJmJ0WwLHshWQsYbiFMzC/21xBCI7/Ms6MbhfHpYlwQ7X9QNgwDzHuE+rW IhmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVrvU3YjJuxkp1sUWKEXcG2Od2NZYf3gWdlC+txmty0OfW5bPlM iFDG/Owl4hu5/JA9Zq9dxdcFHBrnuuXtm4NNroc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxUw4Rep41MLkIQ8ufQiaE+kgozHaG00fO+/N6khbTDcG6wVyqcObpMn3yv0bUa4ICBCYfGJrAfUsFFBdSDBbY=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:ef03:: with SMTP id j3mr23807011vsr.102.1582498129200; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 14:48:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158240480191.25360.17483359057888584798.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158240480191.25360.17483359057888584798.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:48:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CANUuoLp53rtKSpxR7Zx38ikKYaw+g5a5tzbPmiST475zoXfx1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org, alto-chairs@ietf.org, IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>, Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>, "Gurbani, Vijay (Nokia - US)" <vijay.gurbani@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d949ad059f460ec2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/HEd9E9ag536dbj9yc7wWruSgBjo>
Subject: Re: [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:48:55 -0000
Dear Adam, Thanks for the reminder! We have expanded ALTO in the title: ALTO Cost Calendar -> Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Cost Calendar Richard On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 3:53 PM Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for addressing my comments from the previous IESG evaluation. Please > expand "ALTO" in the title. See > https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt for guidance. > > > > -- -- ===================================== | Y. Richard Yang <yry@cs.yale.edu> | | Professor of Computer Science | | http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/ | =====================================
- [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-al… Adam Roach via Datatracker
- Re: [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-iet… Y. Richard Yang