Re: [alto] Normative References in draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Tue, 12 January 2021 06:43 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659513A112D for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:43:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hvWA0cITPo-r for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 459C53A1125 for <alto@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DFLVt4WcVz67b1V; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:38:14 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.52) by fraeml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2106.2; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 07:43:19 +0100
Received: from DGGEML424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.41) by fraeml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 07:43:18 +0100
Received: from DGGEML531-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.18]) by dggeml424-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0509.000; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:43:14 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Jan Seedorf <ietf@j-f-s.de>, "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [alto] Normative References in draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12
Thread-Index: AdborhZDmTDj1gZLRVaTw70TUtt5oQ==
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 06:43:13 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAADCCC643@dggeml531-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.101.103]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/HkTv11MEg6Tgp89rJn9HsZQYhL0>
Subject: Re: [alto] Normative References in draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 06:43:24 -0000

Hi, Jan and authors of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics:
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: alto [mailto:alto-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Jan Seedorf
发送时间: 2020年11月12日 6:32
收件人: alto@ietf.org
主题: [alto] Normative References in draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12

Dear authors of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12,

while reviewing the document, I notices the following issues with normative references:

1)    [I-D.ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp]
               Previdi, S., Wu, Q., Gredler, H., Ray, S.,
               jefftant@gmail.com, j., Filsfils, C., and L. Ginsberg,
               "BGP-LS Advertisement of IGP Traffic Engineering
               Performance Metric Extensions", draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-
               bgp-03 (work in progress), May 2016.

--> This is an RFC by now, so please fix the ref
[Qin]: I think [I-D.ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp] has already been replaced by RFC8571 in the v-12 or earlier version.

2)    [I-D.ietf-ippm-initial-registry]
               Morton, A., Bagnulo, M., Eardley, P., and K. D'Souza,
               "Initial Performance Metric Registry Entries", draft-ietf-
               ippm-initial-registry-01 (work in progress), July 2016.

--> this draft is in version -016 by now, and also not a normative
reference; so please update the ref and move it to informative references

[Qin]: Agree, I have checked the reference, I found [I-D.ietf-ippm-initial-registry] has been quoted four times but I didn't find this reference section 9.1 or section 9.2, I think this issues should be fixed.
Also IDnits should be fixed as well,
https://www6.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-13.txt
There are 3 nits errors which should be fixed.

Can you please address these issues as well when you address the WGLC 
comments received (see below)?

Thanks,

Jan

Am 08.11.20 um 22:56 schrieb Jan Seedorf:
> Dear all,
>
> this ends the WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. No 
> objections on this document have been raised. Three individual reviews 
> have been done, the respective comments have each been posted on the 
> ALTO mailing list by Kai (Oct 10), Denny (Oct 12), and Jensen (Oct 
> 13). May I kindly ask the authors of the document to address these 
> comments ASAP and post a new version of the document?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jan
>
> Am 28.09.20 um 18:42 schrieb Jan Seedorf:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> as discussed during the ALTO session at IETF-108, we are moving 
>> forward with all the remaining milestones.
>>
>> Thus, this email starts a WGLC for 
>> draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-12. The WGLC will run two weeks, 
>> so from today, Monday, September 28, until Monday, Oktober 12, 2020.
>>
>> We would like to have two individual reviews of this document as part 
>> of the WGLC. Please send us an email if you are willing review the 
>> draft as part of WGLC. We really need these reviews to make progress.
>>
>>  - Vijay and Jan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> alto mailing list
>> alto@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
alto@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto