Re: [alto] [IANA #1230654] [Errata Verified] RFC7285 (6876)

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Mon, 16 May 2022 06:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B89C14F6F9 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2022 23:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-FhjP5giWXE for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2022 23:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75154C14F726 for <alto@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2022 23:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr02.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4L1qJL4Kbtz4xY4; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:35:46 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1652682946; bh=X1Bb9Tq3+PZDO34FDutUg8hGn6NhJfuk9v3dM/iYy7s=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=LO6OZe4o00TeCANUWAxnLrnsyw5ki8/6Zp+MmhiG2+VvCT88rZVUxe3PbzCNV06UR KIKsuKJ3v05JUzPE0by7EeZJMpDsj8MmFjp8k4fhRFsyetKREfCjBM1pseXB2TqdzL ZllLkSboAVCO5ijvhZaMSToTw8AuyhZV/aXxiWyr+02XAE0I7w48pIbo0/8Jpcq/mZ Hbx/A9yj036exhWtCuf8xRkSdJtQrHWbodD9Ux4WV4Wy+xJ/P+bCA4wlnmgvDumiOs phuKFyoumP5FvafUkBQ1PIpUqNIT3itxY7bMVBV2caDbcWGNJ/lsLFFkpJQPH+tgjF 1iy5IXGPj8tbg==
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "iana-matrix@iana.org" <iana-matrix@iana.org>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
CC: "martin.h.duke@gmail.com" <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, "ietf-alto@skiesel.de" <ietf-alto@skiesel.de>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [IANA #1230654] [Errata Verified] RFC7285 (6876)
Thread-Index: AQHYZwPHUhFo0e4HX0OEWC5lppi0f60dGzkAgABPpB+AA6TOMA==
Content-Class:
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 06:35:46 +0000
Message-ID: <11574_1652682946_6281F0C2_11574_40_1_99998d1738ba4548a9f275898d2839b2@orange.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1230654@icann.org> <20220512220950.4BEC71330F3@rfcpa.amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-15384-1652471886-1534.1230654-37-0@icann.org> <Yn67CnnPp9ECKHyC@l1.wurstkaes.de> <rt-4.4.3-16350-1652474904-49.1230654-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-16350-1652482473-29.1230654-37-0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-16350-1652482473-29.1230654-37-0@icann.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SetDate=2022-05-16T06:33:41Z; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Method=Privileged; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Name=unrestricted_parent.2; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ActionId=cfabad16-234d-4d04-854a-4c83b3f77a77; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ContentBits=0
x-originating-ip: [10.115.26.50]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/IAwqFoTNYIsaeeucV77jbcQC-Vw>
Subject: Re: [alto] [IANA #1230654] [Errata Verified] RFC7285 (6876)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 06:35:52 -0000

Hi Amanda, all,

The changes look good to me. Thank you for taking care of this.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Amanda Baber via RT <iana-matrix@iana.org>
> Envoyé : samedi 14 mai 2022 00:55
> À : rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Cc : yry@cs.yale.edu; w.roome@alcatel-lucent.com;
> sprevidi@cisco.com; shalunov@shlang.com;
> richard_woundy@cable.comcast.com; repenno@cisco.com;
> ralimi@google.com; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; martin.h.duke@gmail.com; ietf-
> alto@skiesel.de; alto@ietf.org
> Objet : [IANA #1230654] [Errata Verified] RFC7285 (6876)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The headers for the affected registries now read as follows:
> 
> ALTO Cost Metrics
> Registration Procedure(s): IETF Review
> Reference: [RFC7285][RFC Errata 6874]
> Note: Identifiers prefixed with 'priv:' are reserved for Private
> Use (see [RFC7285], Section 10.6).
> 
> ALTO Endpoint Property Types
> Registration Procedure(s): IETF Review
> Reference: [RFC7285][RFC Errata 6876]
> Note: Identifiers prefixed with 'priv:' are reserved for Private
> Use (see [RFC7285], Section 10.8.2).
> 
> The "priv:" registration has been removed from each registry.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> IANA Operations Manager
> 
> On Fri May 13 20:48:24 2022, ietf-alto@skiesel.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 07:58:06PM +0000, Amanda Baber via RT
> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This question relates to both 6874 and 6876:
> > >
> > > Should "priv:" be removed from the ALTO Cost Metrics and ALTO
> > > Endpoint Property Types registries? See
> > >
> > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/alto-protocol
> > >
> > > If so, should we add the note "Note: Identifiers prefixed with
> > > 'priv:'
> > > are reserved for Private Use (see RFC 7285, Section 10.8.2)"
> to the
> > > top of each registry?
> >
> > Please note the two different references to different sections
> of the
> > document for the two registries.
> >
> > Please add
> >
> > Note: Identifiers prefixed with 'priv:' are reserved for Private
> Use
> > (see RFC 7285, Section 10.6)
> >
> > to the ALTO Cost Metrics registry and
> >
> > Note: Identifiers prefixed with 'priv:' are reserved for Private
> Use
> > (see RFC 7285, Section 10.8.2)
> >
> > to the ALTO Endpoint Property Types registry.
> >
> > thanks
> > Sebastian


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.