Re: [alto] ALTO weekly meetings

[Mirja Kuehlewind <[e-mail]>]

Hi Vijay, hi Janson,

I also recommend to actually use the official wg mailing list for logistics. The load on the alto mailing is anyway not super high and this would give everybody who is interested to join the chance to do so and thereby increases transparency.

Mirja


> On 11. Apr 2019, at 01:16, Jensen Zhang <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Vijay,
> 
> Thanks for your advice. I totally agree with you. We will be very careful to use this reminder mailing list. Any discussions will still go to the official mailing list.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jensen
> 
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:41 PM Vijay Gurbani <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Jensen, my advice would be that you use one of the many free email lists, instead of getting another ALTO-related IETF mailing list.  This will just add confusion on the purpose of these lists.
> 
> As far as I know, the official work of an IETF working group is conducted on the WG email list.  If you want to set up an alternate list purely for logistic purposes, that is fine, but please be aware that such an alternate list is not a substitute for the WG mailing list.  Any decisions you reach among yourself on this alternate list still need to be ratified on the official mailing list.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 2:46 PM Jensen Zhang <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hi Mirja,
> 
> Thanks for your suggestion. The discussion of documents and WG issues will still be in the official working group mailing list. This new mailing list is just for the reminders of our weekly meetings. As Richard mentioned, we don't want to spam the [e-mail] list. From next week, for people who still want to receive the meeting reminders, we will use this list to notify them.
> 
> Maybe the mailing list name is confusing. Sorry about that.
> 
> Do you know if we can apply a new @ietf.org mailing list for this special usage? That may be better.
> 
> P.S.: Updated your email address.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jensen
> 
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:18 PM Mirja Kuehlewind <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I just got a subscription notification to an alto-discussion mailing list. Please use the official working group mailing list instead. Discussing document state and actively working in documents in what the official working group mailing list is for and it does not provide a good impression if this is done on a closed list instead.
> 
> Mirja
> 
> P.S.: Please use my new Ericsson email address in future: [e-mail] - the ETH will only work until end of May.
> 
> 
> 
>> On 9. Apr 2019, at 18:52, Danny Alex Lachos Perez <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello everybody
>> 
>> Just a friendly reminder that we will have our ALTO weekly meeting this Wednesday (Apr-10) at 9:30 am US ET. 
>> Let's use the zoom link https://yale.zoom.us/j/8423318713 to meet.
>> 
>> Agenda:
>>  • Extensions (5G, and other use cases)
>>  • 10-15 mins: Existing WG items (Unified Properties and FCI)
>> Finally (as Richard mentioned a couple of weeks ago),  we will stop to send reminder e-mails for the alto@ietf in order to avoid spamming the alto@ietf mailing list.
>> Please, feel free to let me (or Jensen) know if you want to receive later reminders.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Danny Lachos
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:05 AM Danny Alex Lachos Perez <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> Just a friendly reminder that we will have our ALTO weekly meeting this Wednesday (Apr-03) at 9:30 am US ET.
>> 
>> Agenda*:
>>  • Existing WG items (in particular, Unified Properties and FCI)
>> 
>> *If people have other agenda items, please feel free to post.
>> 
>> Bridge: https://yale.zoom.us/j/8423318713
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Danny Lachos
>> 
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:34 PM Y. Richard Yang <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> Thanks a lot to those who attended the IETF ALTO session the day before yesterday (Tuesday) either remotely using Meetecho or in person in Prague. For those who did not attend, it was a wonderful session, in which we discussed both the progress of existing WG documents and 3 potential remaining work. The chairs and AD provided clear guidance and suggestions!
>> 
>> During the meeting, we mentioned the Wednesday weekly meetings started last year in which a team discusses both the existing WG documents and potential extensions. 
>> 
>> The schedule from this point is planned as the following: we discuss existing documents and extensions in alternate weeks, and hence the plan for the next 4 weeks is the following:
>> 
>> - Apr. 3: Existing documents; in particular, Unified Properties and FCI
>> - Apr. 10: Extensions (5G, and other use cases)
>> - Apr. 17: Existing documents, in particular, PV 
>> - Apr. 24: Extensions (5G, and other use cases)
>> 
>> Danny is our meeting tsar; and Jensen the backup tsar. 
>> 
>> It is not required that everyone attends each meeting, but any suggestions for topics are highly welcome. The meetings are open and feel free to join. To avoid spamming the alto@ietf mailing list, we will post meeting reminders for the first two meetings to alto@ietf and then will stop. If you want to receive later reminders, please let me (Danny or Jensen) know, and we will love to have you.
>> 
>> The meetings are always at 9:30 US ET (EU may change Daylight soon and we plan to stick to the US schedule for now).
>> 
>> The meetings use zoom to allow sharing of slides:
>> https://yale.zoom.us/j/8423318713
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Y. Richard Yang
>> Professor of Computer Science
>