[alto] Mirja Kühlewind's Yes on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 21 February 2020 11:17 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: alto@ietf.org
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A014120096; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:17:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org, Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>, alto-chairs@ietf.org, vijay.gurbani@nokia.com, alto@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.118.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <158228386203.28981.3908116746743134956.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:17:42 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/OOsUycoC5uti9MopDv8IPb-zop0>
Subject: [alto] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_Yes_on_draft-ietf-alto?= =?utf-8?q?-cost-calendar-16=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:17:42 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


This is a returning item as initially an IPR declaration what missed to take
over from the initial draft. Therefore we re-ran both wg last call as well as
IETF last call. This version also addresses all review comments from the last
IESG evaluation and hopefully should now be ready to go!

Update: Note the OPSDIR review will be addressed in the next update early next
week (we are just waiting for the main author to return from holidays but
changes has been proposed and agreed with the OPSDIR reviewer).