[alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 22 February 2020 20:53 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org, alto-chairs@ietf.org, alto@ietf.org, Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>, vijay.gurbani@nokia.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <158240480191.25360.17483359057888584798.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 12:53:21 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/Qe7utk75xhOcmRZuRW3FnVhNSvQ>
Subject: [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for addressing my comments from the previous IESG evaluation. Please
expand "ALTO" in the title. See
https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt for guidance.

[alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-al… Adam Roach via Datatracker
Re: [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-iet… Y. Richard Yang