[alto] Status of WGLC reviews --- need one more reviewer for path-vector
Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com> Sat, 17 October 2020 19:21 UTC
Return-Path: <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537B43A08C5 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ft-LOXgj0kvt for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4339A3A08C4 for <alto@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id a4so4984595ybq.13 for <alto@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3MBfEtAJUS4T6ADWkDwTLWwV2Q3h2FkuvsPxUxj7wMk=; b=gqlCaJj95gUoxS9eV0yBLow4PS8DezCAI+ufR03Z6Uh6sYttA9HSW02x0lUBsD8jRO 2B3f7dJz8fFxW0d2NgOBWfitSe2nUmWa6MOV/vUnk2TGulSTjQV5OhvTH6EUqokDidaZ CBM8tgGUi4Z6xZXlIeXExWaP8JRYdB8IyC8OQyJKYFKq1YV7Gvn3ycru4+bxG4zldKJL /e6441pTUje2T7NL7QK9qwUuB5VUq0ipyX4MINhGU5DjdMa12eV1MllIiRq5ns62LYj6 +2OHZci63hks22dHxgCslgxC3+d85URp6zXrAVmEOaXkdgWDC7c7Q+r9LTr7qEl4lIzZ ttJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3MBfEtAJUS4T6ADWkDwTLWwV2Q3h2FkuvsPxUxj7wMk=; b=r07fYG/AJdJNi7xjgQiTiMPsY1Uz2B5uSKEhQ/jBTZeHI1pHOc+xXyoeB7DqyT8HyU 9aALBtfBXWU7IqoPyMoog/W7E2kBV+4a/Jr4fpMAV9wJiCEsw7R5To0mBjqahQfZDMqx QMbCrnA49JlMJs8A6yKMNKQwwB3pBZNpOxHIWgeYwEGh8wYXsaYGrnW7slWKNa9FpDFi WWXjFSCtU7268EJQqiF4SKKEj0XE184MdvgQ9T/jFf9lk/N1R3ByOhfN6i6I8kcGM6qD 18/zLhL5S2LoLI6YQsKmWxNnSHtUnuUqm2nsf6LmhTkR1b+th5mL9i+lz3DglpDcwVg5 mvUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305P7bkuBnZhJJVDJiMw9Tsrr7TaEOwDRiUcUdSQ8FQH69BYVKX iGuDY7oK8OE7Qg8LZmIPZJT4gajVXzhpv+BnrzNZbpPE
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+QrCvlTVTgiR/NgYZ4a4PP6znOy3jMtUf+HAnDjnUu0xkS5mUIOklDB4saMGXkhcIA6r/Ywwfc8IbHSYqcxM=
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:b86:: with SMTP id l6mr12198539ybq.258.1602962464230; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 14:20:41 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMMTW_+_ag+cYuyof=n+uVkt2r3i70hU8e7CF0QXF9nWEznY5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000044d1ba05b1e2c813"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/RabpKkOYtZCh4e1DqjW0Wy4QMvo>
Subject: [alto] Status of WGLC reviews --- need one more reviewer for path-vector
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 19:21:10 -0000
All: This is my view of WGLC reviews for unified-props, performance-metrics, and path-vector. I will like the authors of each draft to read the status below and respond. unified-props: Needed one more review, which was provided by Luis. Given the previous review by Danny, this draft now needs a revision to address comments raised. (Thanks, Luis and Danny.) Authors, please advise on next steps. performance-metrics: WGLC ended Oct 12. Has three reviews: Danny, Jensen, and Kai (thanks!). Authors, please advise on next steps. path-vector: WGLC ended Oct 12. Has only one review by Qiao (thanks!). Need a second review for this work to progress. Anyone wants to volunteer? Thanks, - vijay