[alto] Review of draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc and supporting WGLC.

Qiao Xiang <xiangq27@gmail.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 12:07 UTC

Return-Path: <xiangq27@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C50B131CDC for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id omhYPEXskwSu for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22a.google.com (mail-yw0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7938A131CD9 for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id y186so17762114ywc.1 for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PG1bOWS7KcFVio7saOOH25q0akEn1KC1zfvUl9zpH9A=; b=npGUhsOyEirLhBtFqCXz8IA1b8uW83b742FngfgAXO70cisCY6CcpZa5v4dCGP6Rk9 JLGH1kamC1QIjmU7l4j9I9PGeEhWKgXT2OSHlLZ9sBzH6kogTsKxt/cRhkn3a+5UITk8 JSXZR3Aye0sifjijoq35Jd+THZ/gViTk1pjvXeDskAMmi9nxlu+HfdNBeRkb33Rfjkbh XjbDPn4whkEo033fQwAniqbDsSBOIdiRrO57fxAzcuSEYGaV0Z31qDvYrk1+zd6HXzxs 1SCj+aewDKKJ7RAlkvyK3MutGXJVUMecmjfQ9B8H+xq2G3Sd2MyEmFt2TiKKUxGnEO/M ZoiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PG1bOWS7KcFVio7saOOH25q0akEn1KC1zfvUl9zpH9A=; b=GXRK4gu0XrkYyKYsXewgLdNI8ibSz+FAImYe2DL3boqJRVeSyp/8WbKqeG/nT7OyrL 3K5sPn9xAdXfhDnuqKMsVi1lVpK0MGBoqpdBM/xkpUkBDLwT7ja7QTP+mUJZoxMIP7yb FRCz6m0WvzqcvQdjMfcf7TF3Qe7L1vZmaLuNSUR0QhTA8UWWXL4sKASqlQVVOLJzz4ta hYCW/bAthVnLQ6L4AO3jpLMgfFwpmEAo+xhafpGfRqCa83OMalXi1emPzPTlWjTljPtX Gwf2cmUzJYZ4n0QdlaPUUHA6lI5QvVsmKOR1RxD374OjOxs67HLzC7KfdXaGARjVC9Mi vNxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110CPBkYs3I1FqxTw9+cC3WUvvTtR2ivMvkOeBSCDsFBl1ABNcdw 9LhysP+uwsm1M+51TcrHeT4UDfW+kKPialI=
X-Received: by 10.129.80.68 with SMTP id e65mr248071ywb.371.1500466034574; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.124.196 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 05:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Qiao Xiang <xiangq27@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:06:54 +0800
Message-ID: <CAOB1xS_X3z4hbdkSVLTHtZNZc5GnYCeYQB9pWEwe3vjJW2Vq4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147fa24fd0d0b0554aa7808"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/U9nzDWXmGwWqqXHCURWfehJj2Dk>
Subject: [alto] Review of draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc and supporting WGLC.
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:07:21 -0000

Dear Sebastian, Martin and WG members,

I reviewed the draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc document. Overall the document is
well written. It provides a smart solution to address Req. AR-33 in
RFC6708. The idea to use reverse DNS lookup for cross-domain server
discovery is elegant. I add some editorial comments for this document in
the following. Other than these, it is my opinion that this document should
be last called.


===Comments===
Section 3
Page 12, I might be extra picky here, but the title of this section is
formatted as:
"Using the ALTO Protocol with  ALTO Cross-Domain Server Discovery",
while it should be formatted as:
"Using the ALTO Protocol with ALTO Cross-Domain Server Discovery".
with an extra space after "with" deleted.

Section 3.1
Page 13, line 1: "in the subsection below." Based on the context, this
subsection refers to Section 3.4. It should be stated explicitly.

Section 3.4
Page 14, case 4:
"...the ALTO client should split the list of source addresses, and perform
separately for each source address the same steps as in case 1, as
specified above.  As an alternative, the ALTO client could also split the
list of destination addresses,..."

the expression should be consistent with case 3. I suggest it is changed to:

"...the ALTO client may split the list of source addresses, and perform
separately for each source address the same steps as in case 1, as
specified above.  As an alternative, the ALTO client may also split the
list of destination addresses,..."

Appendix A
Page 24, para 1: "A solution for the problem described in the previous
section". Which section is referred to should be explicitly stated.

Appendix B
Page 29, all the "m"s in the equation computing P(X=k) should be "M"



Best
Qiao
-- 
Qiao Xiang
Postdoctoral Fellow,
Department of Computer Science,
Yale University