[alto] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-20: (with COMMENT)

[Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-20: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 3.1.1.:
  I feel strongly that this document should not restate the pseudo-code for the
  JSON merge patch algorithm and should instead use a reference to Section 2 of
  RFC7396 instead. This will avoid inconsistencies (e.g. note that the pseudo
  code in this draft is *already different* from that in RFC7396 even though
  the difference is only the braces) and be amenable to updates to RFC7396.

References:

Is there a reason this document is using the obsoleted JSON reference to
RFC7159? Suggest updating the reference to RFC8259.