[alto] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com> Tue, 04 December 2018 07:09 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietf.org
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15073130DCE; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 23:09:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org, Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@nokia.com>, alto-chairs@ietf.org, vijay.gurbani@nokia.com, alto@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.89.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154390734507.31639.3492889788647374321.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 23:09:05 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/Yo2TlVXT6U8viYx_rWmESlGFr2w>
Subject: [alto] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 07:09:05 -0000

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


* Section 4.2.3. and 4.2.4.

This document uses addresses from the allocatable global unicast IPv6 space in
2000::/3 in the examples. Please use addresses from the 2001:db8::/32
documentation prefix instead for the examples as per RFC6890.

* Section 6

Any reason this document requires the use of TLS 1.2 instead of TLS 1.3?