Re: [alto] on-line interop-93 testing

ChenGuohai <chenguohai67@outlook.com> Tue, 15 September 2015 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <chenguohai67@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623551A00B1 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hs666Gd5anjU for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU004-OMC2S35.hotmail.com (blu004-omc2s35.hotmail.com [65.55.111.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0781E1B2C1D for <alto@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU174-W37 ([65.55.111.73]) by BLU004-OMC2S35.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:44:05 -0700
X-TMN: [2INuscCRLkcqpdpoxh9wsDbGcAGHpWah]
X-Originating-Email: [chenguohai67@outlook.com]
Message-ID: <BLU174-W379AD25083AF0DC44A2CDBC05C0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_5282e6ea-ca2f-411f-9bcb-917358b0d86c_"
From: ChenGuohai <chenguohai67@outlook.com>
To: Roome Wendy <w.roome@alcatel-lucent.com>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 01:44:04 +0000
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <D21C6DAC.498769%w.roome@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <D21C6DAC.498769%w.roome@alcatel-lucent.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2015 01:44:05.0000 (UTC) FILETIME=[0132A080:01D0EF58]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/Z1g2YA6wA7U7A5Vw5eB7ihd3M2I>
Subject: Re: [alto] on-line interop-93 testing
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 01:44:18 -0000

Hi Wendy,
 
I shall make my ALTO client(interop) updated to 01 version.
 
And I shall do interop test with your server.
BR
G.Robert Chen
 
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:27:24 -0400
> From: w.roome@alcatel-lucent.com
> To: alto@ietf.org
> Subject: [alto] on-line interop-93 testing
> 
> I now have two versions of my on-line interop test tool, for the -00 and
> -01 versions of the test spec, respectively:
> 
>    http://www.wdroome.com/alto/interop-93-client-00.php
>    http://www.wdroome.com/alto/interop-93-client-01.php
> 
> Right now
> 
>    http://www.wdroome.com/alto/interop-93-client.php
> 
> links to the -00 version. On Wednesday, Sept. 16, I will change that to
> link to the -01 version.
> 
> Unless someone objects, on Wednesday I will also change our public test
> server,
>    http://alto.alcatel-lucent.com:8000/directory
> to use the -01 version of the interop cost maps. (It is messy to provide
> both versions of the server simultaneously, and I doubt that anyone really
> needs that).
> 
> 	- Wendy Roome
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto