Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-14.txt

Vijay Gurbani <> Tue, 17 November 2020 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E7F3A0E6F for <>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:58:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDBQBtVvWTAb for <>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:58:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7F0D3A0E68 for <>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:58:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id t33so20605508ybd.0 for <>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:58:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5EtxcPSM0ruidTdokdQk9Bj29jKs+AklmjOnPX3gA2Y=; b=TJMMVh8TQQb/dK9fY6H8D3gv1jiUaCEWfbBJ2wtDrqvDGt/3C1SCmP7YRImmZmP1se Z9CM6Tu35Pdt+3EZmoonaC52k76akKDctDifFmw3romjEzUP1FRxLWQfcvvL4iDaNSt6 yHuX0NzZ2o5oaNBdhVTea5ASctFLSTnhYGRJLnuG9GoP84b2Qd5pOufEpbBVYrBO6i23 vx9GNaLEGLGq+qV+liFFBPHsezGfJUggAB13v77qTvcMyU/e2lVgtcq/reQHb2+gDi2y ScuavXiOjq25RLyYQfFJj51NpBKVGnxBQ/vDBhyCNcgkF5/SIZtzpRre/C2ieXaGez9K 8rbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5EtxcPSM0ruidTdokdQk9Bj29jKs+AklmjOnPX3gA2Y=; b=Ri5oKey7uMcc+cTapFid7h8y8uF9ZV/cbB4snDpPBthQKPMlaXweaTJ9FZwY3U6JW/ Pa/54GPWFsxBpASVGc5jPt2CuVEuBRdTjkHb6v70E08tP78EwxHe714Thd44N+M5iWAT OW52uNS5GO6amjlwlCngWDS+6vsJ8sjk+BlOXiyPWxJ7jw1GoYo6mChmxUzjQGj92X+z m2NOS2LU/Ju98VvFOi3Dmk2HTFPdPfxUrQF9HhyGHBnkghBSt/Jffm5ZS9x3+/bgFMgZ +aFhC+OXIZ1ahyly3j563ouS7ILlTzxxjtOxDci6PR19X3ffQ/NcMaGAQXkOO5amIQhk WwPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531m3jyXEAhbpZJ9yk8XzjcHJ0Lo8xY2/tOhq2A6t4ZRJbJ+0OAk 1J6jm4aGWDCNF9abh6dgDz2MqGFGW7292vDpeaQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxhtCuCci/Yxw2UgAKbx4Rn5vwlotI9PaL+7NEFB4zWxwkJ+bb/TNYVDS9e98BrFxNRL1vateAQkVrqXVkMsx8=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:60d7:: with SMTP id u206mr2988231ybb.315.1605653894714; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:58:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Vijay Gurbani <>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:57:37 -0600
Message-ID: <>
To: "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <>
Cc: "" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000006d6fb05b4556ed3"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-14.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:58:17 -0000

Please put the table in the end.  You can have a forward reference to the
table at the beginning of the I-D to let people know.

I will like to perform a chair/shepherd review on a version that close to
being a final one.


On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 1:15 PM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia -
FR/Paris-Saclay) <> wrote:

> Dear all,
> Version 13 - draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-13.txt posted on Nov 2nd
> addresses the review comments of Danny and most comments of Luis. This
> version 14 addresses pending comments of the review provided by Luis. The
> only unresolved comment by Luis is providing a table listing the protocol
> extensions and pointing to the relevant sections in the text. Given that
> the extensions are defined progressively, we need to figure out where to
> place the table in the document (beginning or end). Any suggestion is
> welcome.
> I will send separate e-mails to Danny and Luis, to describe how their
> review comments were addressed. Great thanks again to both for the thorough
> review.