Re: [alto] [ALTO CDNI] Discussion Points in this interim and Jensen will be the presenter
Jensen Zhang <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com> Tue, 11 December 2018 15:19 UTC
Return-Path: <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8207D12D84C; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:19:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WkdZlV6raXOl; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:19:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 418F9127333; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:19:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com with SMTP id s15so6823081ybk.6; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:19:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SxGHDOT4xj7xzBjq0QeuuTe4gXIRG2c11ln8aT9NQdg=; b=XrDS3i1ntQn6SVBBad8ABSBafMJuXWOjRJjd9pT62NBLtbKeSUtHdBgYhXBVtKQh+W 1IqeLu87P9BLQakVtt7DqbBcAb+I0iUILlhh3lVB7QwPMtzC8iyi4qhoYeIUctWsDj3c Jc79/LWTJZl+Fnec8spu86Qj8KUlG+lLOOJRJeYHILlRpOp51xpcwum0sbUJGeLHiydB 0s/I0TyCD8sQQVQHacQik5hrS3W3/T1hn3vwIpx7SyxzFOswVrdilGLWv3HHLreS5wyb l59xR4cfpvPGTttuWqqDiKM13C9kLqwjDXOQpVL1/Hq+m1Z3ck0k68cQAa+qEGPqjgjn +9hg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SxGHDOT4xj7xzBjq0QeuuTe4gXIRG2c11ln8aT9NQdg=; b=gXgobN/0gcFcbx1Y/KGTCIkYDr3FSiTQz9i/vYoY0w0JI2ajzL3vNoPTHrt8Lj2zNl cJNi261K1beeud3Mtulef5IyFilnpGLATs8QSRz+82p7peEbfEtqo1+ZerQpL3sfk3TJ 14ozM32Ia3QUu0yNSkgHSgjwxOhQNqXLeqJUWZUcZqrt0aRixp84EEa22zP2S8gQP43d hlZLWw3MzamoXPMpKEmvmzO+VZfi0qYaE4KaL0VZZo5KmV4MSKCZ4uZbG84sy9mUg55j RYrABZydpOhJ6jAdEHxyWwcu55Vdunfp0sjtxfJsIHaLkgA8+hlLNiMV/8fc2kQDdD7w s6kA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZOZPnRBGGPlukqOKF+JM3KvH098xB+NpARNm+J8vtUlpZCJEk+ BHcPJAExdnfjgltPirsJpI3LaAyCA1WazlvmoYY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VC3wVHZ0gywuJBy3O/04z76bCnM/MiIsBrX7+7c7FEv0pWx/VSW0mE9gk5mGL9MAolK1STDc5+V0YozT/lr/A=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:ad43:: with SMTP id l3mr11711984ybe.298.1544541586127; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:19:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+oaSDpi-xuM+medwG35Uwkj3DJVfUC5obaAkLiD2WUi40a8aA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+oaSDpi-xuM+medwG35Uwkj3DJVfUC5obaAkLiD2WUi40a8aA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jensen Zhang <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:19:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAbpuyqWatb4T2QFmDPHeu1tduyKwyM82S6fEzgbKrZK8WPUOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shawn Lin <x.shawn.lin@gmail.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto@ietf.org, IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000095015b057cc09cff"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/dy8byKVM2Jd595JIYc-p1rmR_zQ>
Subject: Re: [alto] [ALTO CDNI] Discussion Points in this interim and Jensen will be the presenter
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:19:59 -0000
Hi alto-cdni authors and WG, According to the discussion during our interim meeting today, I just have two comments: 1. It is not a good idea to introduce a new Map service for CDNI FCI. There are two reasons: a) CDNI FCI is not a map but an information base. b) If we really want to use a Map service to provide the CDNI FCI, the property map is already enough. If we want some features which the property map cannot provide, I think a new Map service can neither provide them. 2. I hope some author can provide a concrete example or use case to show the property map is not enough for CDNI FCI. If we really have the motivation, I think a new service is required. But it should not be a Map service. Just my 2 cents. Thanks, Jensen On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 10:43 AM Shawn Lin <x.shawn.lin@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear ALTOers, > > > For ALTO CDNI draft, there are two points that may need to be discussed > in this interim meeting. > > > > 1. The motivation of filtering on capabilities/filtering on footprints > may not be strong enough. Is it proper for us to send Email to CDNI WG and > ask comments from them? > 2. The current structure of capabilities with footprints may not be > suitable for map representation (no primary key). One potential > solution is to merge entries with the same CDNI capability so that we can > use the CDNI capability as the primary key. But it is not efficient in some > cases. We will discuss it at the meeting. > > > Sorry, I do not have time to attend the meeting this time, so Jensen will > be the presenter for CDNI. @Jensen, thank you so much for your help! > > > Bests, > > Shawn Lin > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >