Re: [alto] Status of cost-calendar

"Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com> Wed, 06 February 2019 11:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE84E1294FA; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 03:10:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.453
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.453 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77sOUnjbfg0M; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 03:10:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr00124.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.0.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFF3A126C7E; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 03:10:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=VZGKcj5ojbDPwIsqrSC7T8+XoogqerPiSGImCRTjw9I=; b=aWDA4UhtUhS59PFjRDANqq5ku8m5p6VVZLIG0FUppDZZPDssqb4XeADxdl/6L23SfU+sgBUxOafaKagerW8n08YVp+zeDAMdhMxVMfd9aru6CgQmNZ8tjgtBBR+hfoBbzQwXPG98fYeZANH5mrHOatb2z7EKeexGmJlXQoN0k3A=
Received: from AM4PR07MB3236.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.171.189.13) by AM4PR07MB3153.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.171.188.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1601.14; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 11:10:27 +0000
Received: from AM4PR07MB3236.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5c0b:728b:7ba3:9d74]) by AM4PR07MB3236.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5c0b:728b:7ba3:9d74%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1601.016; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 11:10:27 +0000
From: "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>
To: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org>
CC: "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Status of cost-calendar
Thread-Index: AQHUvYD1aKS9Tw2QgUiW4ry1d/hJtKXSnE+Q
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 11:10:27 +0000
Message-ID: <AM4PR07MB3236F1BD1B8CAA0FD4082118956F0@AM4PR07MB3236.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAMMTW_J3JLHfuM8FKUyVbA1iwwioN8XcuXVQGCYG=+fBrAH1vw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMTW_J3JLHfuM8FKUyVbA1iwwioN8XcuXVQGCYG=+fBrAH1vw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com;
x-originating-ip: [135.245.212.89]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM4PR07MB3153; 6:Y7sL1/dFJ1MY96bF/eT5T6CTI+LeR+R62IZq6C1Qn1vchZIkcIO/fqaXHIrxQA8T80Ts4Cd8YSrSv7RwgkX4GDS5zBkG3eY+dDlbJCB1N1AJH2GEhTMMILz6ytCFd2QL1gaTUE1FlYE+Vd6/lpBP9JgUZ/6uPq5/rvOsNlWRCtuZDmJb8Q09lkT8eLQ0bG49ZyI7l1LCaECCLxu+yFA6CEj/HTXSBCiH7PhKhQIx3Ut6kGnYDiv3GptWQ2OvSerJK1tBczMu1gSIc8SlqNmDXvF5EoCCBRxQbmA5o6C1wZE5mygtzHsVOkWedZtCOjkJblU/y3yEUs5c9wEWl6vyrYAMbyASSqrvnpHw41H83HmBXnhZu91qkkfqyeGJljTGgD9p5IAD56EeHnPyT6q7CLtkjykLXCm2GCBNQQ+WfOaLA5HP378S/nVnqBbJNK67hf2+FmRwjlcGfRVJOY699A==; 5:cnBtramN4m7SqOqa7YYVL/m4iMAdRssdbXCEstCigUFalTGpC6fnGPfY76U3d1bi32cqo+P/8lTtJt1V6t23RLbkTBFBNRDLTAUPQjlzC45KYe8J9dqodY9P0hrkSyNhjOA7Cural+8Y+GcFfzCl6+ikVy9urszsO4bnjztF2n7zyV6IeBtq9HKNQU5HiSjbNVp3qnjcb2gtY1VXvbAZAw==; 7:6bl5kzfApO25K31IAtt5qCfiTN3vD0qCMBbpGlUgsnbryriiNeZDQJsckLJavjrq2JIQQ/377cUulThkMkGuyVqGNGv67vrA/QBD6tslhwx7SFDLgNRZG4FOErLz12kB0pC4lWDIqtXLhj7Z5Lt6jA==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bc6079dc-57a8-45bd-4240-08d68c23b313
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600110)(711020)(4605077)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:AM4PR07MB3153;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM4PR07MB3153:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM4PR07MB3153B8B3F4465A5C57FEF55F956F0@AM4PR07MB3153.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0940A19703
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(366004)(376002)(396003)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(51914003)(199004)(189003)(7696005)(66066001)(8936002)(966005)(256004)(478600001)(7736002)(76176011)(74316002)(186003)(14454004)(446003)(316002)(97736004)(476003)(71200400001)(71190400001)(110136005)(99286004)(11346002)(8676002)(4326008)(26005)(25786009)(81166006)(102836004)(2501003)(81156014)(53936002)(54896002)(86362001)(6306002)(6246003)(53546011)(6506007)(486006)(3480700005)(6436002)(9686003)(6116002)(790700001)(3846002)(106356001)(105586002)(606006)(236005)(33656002)(55016002)(68736007)(2906002)(229853002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM4PR07MB3153; H:AM4PR07MB3236.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia-bell-labs.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: lrs7F0roR3XPXeHwSnVNMv2/ms6KCkg0fAOQCltUoTtuKle7jzxc4JTK9mc8ORgF0cVZj/Wu+25KO/qzp5zqbJpWFJKoR8EMjcKvlEGHTLgDO/9rzMgE06TkTXDBfL+F3mE5GqoUUSKe7Ff4LWpN0RxM+SS9bVXDS0Ven/FVq1GSejUk8udiKmJgyLnKy/ZLP7f4Dbufwxsq0GzyiNeRh3Kue5QIagi50zf2nKp7WcQt+6RH6msWbVrqXN7oW5rESk+Yxy/HTUal3gKmKpVoaZ+mckjQPjTdcCb6ztJQJjlcKQFLnXN/7iVaGWg8c4d6d+RsFZ79zN6pzwbA8ygdJACtND5tKIRgTjj5PKJOJhVZtarESXvdmBFM0YolOLsbj4dlaCK1XzXB8yFyRwdrK65pBvV7UILlWSBtvIH1Wt8=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM4PR07MB3236F1BD1B8CAA0FD4082118956F0AM4PR07MB3236eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia-bell-labs.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bc6079dc-57a8-45bd-4240-08d68c23b313
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Feb 2019 11:10:27.4270 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM4PR07MB3153
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/t6uBCh00JaNSP2z90ewcq9TFAQI>
Subject: Re: [alto] Status of cost-calendar
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 11:10:34 -0000

Hi Vijay,

Thanks for the clarification. I will then just cite RFC 8259 in the intro and 3.1. Maybe the “operational considerations” section can include a paragraph saying that implementations using UTF-{16,32} need to be cognizant of both the 8259 evolution that mandates UTF-8, essentially for interoperability reasons. Therefore it is recommended for them to switch to UTF-8 encoding.

Thanks,
Sabine

From: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>;
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2019 7:31 PM
To: draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org; Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>;
Cc: alto@ietf.org
Subject: Status of cost-calendar

Sabine, Based on my posting on the mailing list [1], it does not appear that ALTO or any of its extensions are intimately tied to UTF-{16,32}.

As such, please reference the new JSON RFC 8259 in the Introduction to the cost-calendar draft and please move it ahead as soon as possible after incorporating other comments from IESG review.

I have forgotten whether we have to redo the WG and IETF last calls.  Can you please provide the status of the draft with respect to IETF last call and whether we need to do a WGLC again.

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/EGuPfDqoYBv7H8grPXE0qtjQsGc

Thank you.