Re: [alto] Interested in reviewing unified-props? And other drafts as well

Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com> Tue, 29 September 2020 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105DF3A0FC1 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YFmnrZeS1Kgt for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 545CA3A0F7C for <alto@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id z23so16109581ejr.13 for <alto@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9ilN3n5H75G/fBUc2ISaWUhlC7M5+QA51f+Dt36IuwQ=; b=BdNCxfrvYpv9zKMtpExT2erAgperTi1g9vlilCrBpgyzbAi0BMpcuxsl9J8QYNBj4G cUpj9ftgL8mxCBuJA19YZNlgqlMNP0Afwo8XWOVyaLQgrck4fnq/gbiLwdIbPyIRnJeb RmrBqhLd4XBNuTn/OiPJLOkdy4vNvrlR1Y8lO6DNr2zUwez7hQ0hCXVmmDv9fjJmaRFL +M+Sh8WskaYLUZV4Byb9fbD7sX6Jb9qfzdjmpmRJRwv++v3wFdISjXjpDyC0LWsT9dN9 PZq+gdccI8uys5HhcwF/PaqZFaRBkuYCEbN2kBrrvKpr5+jNZmwrQeQR+WKaS2lkTgAj 43Cw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9ilN3n5H75G/fBUc2ISaWUhlC7M5+QA51f+Dt36IuwQ=; b=XBKOnTVISTHuMexCAYdzwCiJrnDphim/Nhsr8LGE8DJhaSjwazPknHuTx8QoxCITY8 Dtb0NTXases7vmZHAc4q6h1AvuNYgtbcKImkC1GXoPsZBdvyF+F71Fnnr4Y6WQBRvc57 O2oNis6RXvTPlbCt5Tx9nFQcaOi/1ebbMzSPtc6VvEU1HLGCNFud4Rw7qNBJHXuQVZ/f 9GEJRJMOSAFECcvvV7oino/AU78tzfxAhN8DH5L1E3cw60iZ12kluF79S/6CVLfbMvgQ zzemfEeVtEnsBo1er/lynu+gjz/w8+PSz50eRO3BEjPioOfZOPOFHGBfeexh8F+2A2H0 STug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532xwQP/6MboDqDkpaqmMLqMnRk8ZHM7EXI9n8gJdEdUqqM7LLTh ZDcgJZfJUOtYxoEsXvwUTVptyUNaNZR5/IeXF3k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwExI0de43tzT9NXsy33a4X0IC+IzevVUjFqSrBtNeb48EWZFEQ2KKebhbQHW78uLJVxO+MRL23o/zACDTK5jk=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5509:: with SMTP id r9mr5119290ejp.12.1601400619573; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 10:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMMTW_+1BDb7zSqN=uNye6OiBcjz_JEpEJnmJ7tU-7rRY00g0w@mail.gmail.com> <VI1PR0601MB21571DA4AF2C8485A4829A699E350@VI1PR0601MB2157.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0601MB21571DA4AF2C8485A4829A699E350@VI1PR0601MB2157.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:30:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMMTW_Jk0tVm-z2gqiiwfa=73tsdXd=JfPwyzxM6sB-6NEcM1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>
Cc: "Luis M. Contreras" <contreras.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000012a62605b07723c2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/kqy8k3cSkoiOQ4CjRC2wJ6WHMyA>
Subject: Re: [alto] Interested in reviewing unified-props? And other drafts as well
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:30:35 -0000

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:48 AM LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <
luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com> wrote:

> Hi Vijay,
>
>
>
> My apologies for my lack of responsiveness, I have had a number of
> subsequent events impeding me to concentrate on this.
>
>
>
> My answer is yes, and I take October 9th as hard deadline for providing
> my review. Is that correct?
>
>
Dear Luis: Thank you for getting back to me with an affirmative response.
Yes, Oct 9 is the hard deadline.

I appreciate your time and attention to moving this work forward.

Ciao,

- vijay