Re: [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 30 January 2019 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDEC130EBF; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:37:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id slqtBoMe3GkG; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:37:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C2C812008A; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:37:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MacBook-Pro.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0UNbdKS045335 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:37:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1548891461; bh=qpO1Jnt/qAf0oVlPbDXwD1oaVZtJstBehcv9+LMOmcw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QjVE6KIWBw/YcVozNCoWiov/V9DZM/PZg0ELc05iX4d9DQe/KILwIJ7aUzjcFGHP6 SPXv5csqQf7FWfK/eEdHSUqnc91PdNQxP2lfkcDQvJf+WLwFuTYfOesVGzCexrgHAt iTRkJwbMQvy+g0TzpEns/rUJhyAJhdGxepOv9RDc=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be MacBook-Pro.roach.at
To: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>, Kai GAO <godrickk@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "alto-chairs@ietf.org" <alto-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>
References: <154345970393.13521.17177728478340801020.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <AM4PR07MB3236DD059F50035D0F5C8F21959B0@AM4PR07MB3236.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <1497dbf3-d057-160b-f81a-bbf6b496d81b@nostrum.com> <AM4PR07MB32366E0069BFE9CD455D012095970@AM4PR07MB3236.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOELiNNUUMJCDWoCAUhpwscV3R9VocjPCE6a+icSuVf3DNmyzQ@mail.gmail.com> <022cc047-a7aa-e087-8638-8f9798e4ea91@nostrum.com> <CAOELiNPU-vdOSEWbs4eJyUAqiactSSM7Y3K7GMndNE7St-Ju-w@mail.gmail.com> <20190130161322.GA49072@kduck.mit.edu> <CAOELiNP96Lzn3Ba9vksDe5xWT-OCRD=+2HTcRxLcq4HvpJ19RQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMTW_LjfmmPq4GfFUdfT5a-PTtjRXaj2_57DcUmZkrrpRTiDA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <d63e67fe-f5c9-9a38-5a37-e7eff834c157@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:37:34 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMMTW_LjfmmPq4GfFUdfT5a-PTtjRXaj2_57DcUmZkrrpRTiDA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/kr5Y30JcunolL8x-BW2Rp-vVVsw>
Subject: Re: [alto] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 23:37:49 -0000

On 1/30/19 4:26 PM, Vijay Gurbani wrote:
> Do I get the sense that the WG thinks that this is the best course of 
> action?  (I must apologize as I am coming up to speed on this issue.  
> If I was to produce a 1 sentence summary of the issue here, it is that 
> RFC 8259 normatively requires UTF-8 encoding and that there are 
> existing ALTO implementations conformant to RFC 7285 that use 
> encodings other than UTF-8.  Is that accurate?).


That's my understanding, modulo any other JSON changes you might want to 
highlight. Again, I think RFC 7647 provides a good example of how this 
kind of thing can be clarified.

/a