Re: [alto] unified-props, cellular addresses and path-vector

"Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu> Fri, 23 February 2018 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <yang.r.yang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2783C126C2F for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:10:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9dbnnBhcLU4L for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:10:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BD6A1201F2 for <alto@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:10:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id o145so10584975lff.0 for <alto@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:10:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=hcJbRdDRIF1YULoSPlVWr0Fl0V1VAyWcwDPJmgU8n6U=; b=rKtZpQrGzb8J5YooDiXB2L7EJ6iLPfaj3xmXxd6DT4GnEbJrbzmGEiokoC6VEqhkEc qvW/kLaAKiF856o8HDOXA7fJyepkaVrGLXfpU2cP36VDcG/2VE+B7OfGOzIOcFaKq61z JrcSRayAX8Fwb06Qd56L9HeHRsh2vT3bSuRfs93kxMKfRUp0LZ8LSagiZTWfpG0IqNeB ZakGii9xU9dysOKQWQaPuBjv3lmTThDWfqeYZ4XhyYK89ORAEMp+MYF6bhWH1OJBmFZR 1HS7k0xTxCUSTwyBvuFXvlWjHah3hX0WgcAXwX03Oc/sFjXzUYsPbJss7ruMt/qp08Dc JswQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hcJbRdDRIF1YULoSPlVWr0Fl0V1VAyWcwDPJmgU8n6U=; b=JahTd/k/k7/tL25CCmqT3svd8xjH8odmGA33dAVoshxiyBToh0dog1fubr0hBtNFE8 f6f4IgRuIrkCBG0mjxSaM7eoOe5E/WkNVN8PdfC0J9B0+U5M9H/7QTKmNYkyJzM1tLcH aopJgwDBTHH+Efe969TiTJm89XbBs3O0QvBQAZQ0/APt/kL1E6rOjJYMBPLdBpeZ2wCz XbJDeHDvAIZkRPMy3PD6zXQnb66ViGOJUYcGld9qqM1xkXe3hq5bxOW6uAiw6yicbuHx HRysQ+pfVOqvEBKKaJyozer0a+ClvqGbs6/wxVuXDokpXkQLOXtqQ4au5CFg0aDv7IV+ FyOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBTatRyG3yd3aclHwhC/H+LaY3Ub3o1AT6z3ttDZHClqsmQU9fB THWfovuQpjPbc1LmhHYQIexlZ2NI9SXsMvjgeGQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsNgNMU0bXJ2M3Z7/iJWVuga4Msj+1QxyaUS0xpY8eglC3GXJ0F125o1FGXEKe94g8H6obGMn3KJyREJbgOAc4=
X-Received: by 10.25.59.136 with SMTP id d8mr2190377lfl.42.1519413037320; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:10:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yang.r.yang@gmail.com
Received: by 10.46.50.26 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:10:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR02MB1202578B8645F956E30B7066B5CC0@BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <5e6a98ff-3c8d-f1b8-2deb-21788cdfef09@nokia.com> <BLUPR02MB1202578B8645F956E30B7066B5CC0@BLUPR02MB1202.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:10:36 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: yURHoKJuuKCiecfn1sfRrABIOmk
Message-ID: <CANUuoLrAR=b9b36extXU6Hc6VSv1ExsD7Yze09b8WUnfSnbJCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dawn Chan <dawn_chen_f@hotmail.com>
Cc: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vijay.gurbani@nokia.com>, Wendy Roome <wendy@wdroome.com>, "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c126afe5b4ea70565e5eacd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/lxQERmX3Wqj1AC1zID993yP7w28>
Subject: Re: [alto] unified-props, cellular addresses and path-vector
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 19:10:42 -0000

It looks that the suggestion by Dawn is reasonable.

I am taking a look again at the possibility of integrating cellular into UP
quickly. An alternative is that we get it done shortly, in the next couple
days.

If this is the approach, Sabine is a great person to work together. Make
sense, Sabine?

Richard


On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:31 AM, Dawn Chan <dawn_chen_f@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Draft Unified Property is quite stable at the moment, and the major
> problem left is whether the cellular address needs to be appended.
> Actually, since the Unified Property maintains an entity domain registry to
> achieve extensibility so that we suggest the new entity domain cellular
> address to be registered in the https://www.ietf.org/id/
> draft-randriamasy-alto-cellular-adresses-01.txt itself. This way, the
> draft Unified Property can proceed first.
>
> Besides, path-vector and unified property depend on each other so they
> should move as a bundle.
>
> Do you think this is a feasible solution?
>
> On 23 Feb 2018, at 3:16 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@nokia.com>
> wrote:
>
> All: In preparation for moving the unified property draft [0] ahead, the
> minutes of the December 2017 Virtual Interim Meeting [1] indicate that
> the chairs seek answers to the following questions from the WG:
>
> (1) Are cellular addresses an important abstraction that the working
> group will like to introduce in ALTO?  Currently, cellular address
> format is specified in a companion draft [2].
>
> (2) If yes, is the unified-props-new draft the correct place to add the
> cellular representation?
>
> Please note that the unified property draft [0] gates path-vector [3],
> as there is a dependency of path-vector on unified-props.  Thus, the
> plan is to move these two drafts ahead as a bundle.
>
> Which means that we need to reach a conclusion on the questions posed
> above so unified-props and path-vector can move ahead.
>
> Please express an substantive opinion on the above questions in the
> mailing list.
>
> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new/
> [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2017-alto-01/
> materials/minutes-interim-2017-alto-01-201712180600/
> [2]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-randriamasy-alto-cellular-adresses/
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-path-vector/
>
> Thank you,
>
> - vijay
> --
> Vijay K. Gurbani / vijay.gurbani@nokia.com
> Network Data Science, Nokia Networks
> Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
>
>
>


-- 
-- 
 =====================================
| Y. Richard Yang <yry@cs.yale.edu>   |
| Professor of Computer Science       |
| http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/        |
 =====================================