[alto] draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang : Call for volunteers to review 2nd WGLC for ALTO docs

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 21 May 2023 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC08C13AE3D for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 May 2023 15:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.093
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ncGE39YojFv for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 May 2023 15:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5246DC13AE36 for <alto@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 May 2023 15:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 34LMeV0h009061; Sun, 21 May 2023 23:40:31 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9165C4604A; Sun, 21 May 2023 23:40:31 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C23146043; Sun, 21 May 2023 23:40:31 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sun, 21 May 2023 23:40:31 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (82-69-109-75.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.109.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 34LMeUVA015544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 21 May 2023 23:40:31 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Jordi Ros Giralt' <jros@qti.qualcomm.com>, alto@ietf.org
References: <b621af26dab54907b1896890e832003c@huawei.com> <SN6PR02MB5375CABFBA1554FBE9D9EAA6F6049@SN6PR02MB5375.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <TYCPR01MB883453BAA5F9473D581CDD76E1079@TYCPR01MB8834.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> <SN6PR02MB5375FE9A6C367D0C261654F3F60D9@SN6PR02MB5375.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <PAXPR07MB7806CB519303E5DB65AB8984950D9@PAXPR07MB7806.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <SN6PR02MB53758A43A20A5E0D95AB7493F60D9@SN6PR02MB5375.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <PAXPR07MB7806CEC65B7E04CCEBB5B6E6950D9@PAXPR07MB7806.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <SN6PR02MB5375206E00B38D802FF106F1F67E9@SN6PR02MB5375.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR02MB5375206E00B38D802FF106F1F67E9@SN6PR02MB5375.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2023 23:40:30 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <014201d98c35$3fa20b80$bee62280$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0143_01D98C3D.A1670FC0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdmMNThLRSQlpJvFT6OBzYQWK4NhbQ==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 82.69.109.75
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=20221128; bh=CdiNOPwv7LpSZ3zrmLLrv sfcw+sLR4cDpVhh0k/+exs=; b=L3VAUrTYrnhbGRLrI/KRNCCxFf2K6gS5NQ9SG R+kDvLmkRc+txlH6GYVL1y5pdV859uJCT3obMyU+BpvgoSDiOc12WiHP0TjJjJRJ Qa1unjD7Vk9yPzd7XMbLjkGjMQT1aRZl28/VYfJtRfslxq0H8XQkdJf3cuN8m1o0 sL7Wj0LQYc3acmJJTOiWsJcCvMAuSn8zLVMtXm+Pa9z9HcTKjbbmIn7dk/wFtb5c fQvC8ajb6c2omWvs1FOq8+NKokVCjRhtMh8V4LPm89YOeu2/TOqWdnRNi7kgIkSI EZAKt23iCqg2RLsL/Kftfnb3FBCPPeacKhp2d5usb3tUSRnAg==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27642.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--28.800-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--28.800-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27642.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--28.799700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: wgKLxAhaF4EOwAmmWH5kBFCxqE4whnXltwpUiv21DA0wc9ThMH3qV0DT GgXZ5rGIFpv4ALYwnexhy4N4ECRtTS4ZoMjlt7R+st/0YIOSrHAZskwWqoib3K73LMce7RmJvjN 9OkaN1tpYrxECHA2Pi1c8yxkHZ1Tj/eT7aGGj1S/tP6Pv+A+w8xB0ENZnw1vtwR/5Abm5cWsXE9 8y6xdDlqYpu/xFIPE2t8RJVGV/sdvXtPsXTFkp6v3vrjdfNHuXZG3SCLP7QtLInKrwfonFC/2Hm ccZOynIt/w+sxk1xuPeEtMuS1eIW1yhbIB6mAHMrIGj0lq6L0Y4Xay1o5vdnCchfAaDKwjQ7/+9 swuISRXT7QbuKj/gda1DnvO5cSZcx7fBXoDaFyEcQNQCplRkzggqPpbA7sp1Ay6/bz1VsIjFQNP Eve+5IF1bBFlamKmoZmGkOF0fx8xvzOix9zo1q2K3N9p/OFh6z8j+bxoiWAwHAA5cb5vjSrWT8l BWOfnQGJmxWFq4sSfZBAm+nhaLgGr2gluc6ojai+m1DDPm2yJ9itonZum4XpjbnpANyW79XaqMd 2Tc3ytwrONoNuGf86dGUejNy6l6csuqHqj6VCazRPQ8T4oe5S2VljVYB9GN4hfk+pbP18gwsY8w EwLcX+LzNWBegCW26goQOpUkSb60P2qkGU0XymvfiVSqJzu33OnrClxNYa1heV+crsE6IQP90fJ P9eHt
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/o-x48P2riQphlcHH2-rOt0WGIfk>
Subject: [alto] draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang : Call for volunteers to review 2nd WGLC for ALTO docs
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2023 22:40:40 -0000

Hi,

 

I looked at revision -07

 

This is a really big document and would probably benefit from a more
detailed review than I was able to give it. But it looks fine and ready to
progress to me.

 

A couple of nits.

 

Section 4.3 might usefully describe that this is an additional requirement.

 

You might reference draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis instead of RFC6991. You'll
be behind it in the queue, so you can safely use it as a normative
reference. That'll be a bit more future-proof.

 

Cheers,

Adrian

 

 

 

 

From: alto <alto-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Jordi Ros Giralt
Sent: 17 May 2023 06:41
To: alto@ietf.org
Subject: [alto] Call for volunteers to review 2nd WGLC for ALTO docs

 

Hi ALTO WG:

 

As you know, we are in the process of issuing the 2nd WGLC for two of the
ALTO drafts (New Transport and OAM). Thank you to all of you who have been
working hard to help get these documents completed, including all the
detailed feedback provided by reviewers during the first WGLC.

 

There is now a need (as mentioned by the chairs) to have as many eyes &
volunteers review the docs to make sure they are in the best possible shape.
I can volunteer to review both documents. Richard also volunteered, thank
you Richard. We would like to suggest targeting two more volunteers. Could
any of you help support this work?

 

We are targeting 22/05 to complete this new round of revisions, as that's
the target day for the 2nd WGLC.

 

These are the docs:

 

- New Transport:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-new-transport/

- OAM: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang/

 

Please feel free to forward this email if you know others (inside or ouside
ALTO) who can help review the docs too.

 

As we are working to wrap up the current charter, this is very important
work to ensure the quality of the documents produced by ALTO. Thank you for
your collaboration.

 

Jordi, on behalf of ALTO