[alto] Reminder: Poll for virtual interim

Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com> Mon, 12 November 2018 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD453130E4B for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:17:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IJj-Re0aa19n for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:17:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09C38130E4A for <alto@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:17:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id 40so8279552oth.4 for <alto@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:17:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=clwtGF1qxRcJdvFRg72esgnt3w2me7MoYagIlzP5nUU=; b=VvmkzsH18AfF2wpg6vT3J0/Xo+JmZzcs5cFtdNRhQiZurysf9Wu3WhcGpLsQWZRbj3 fHtKIIAapB6qwWC8wHey2oE4CoWUFdkaVBT9ur4RxVDCgeohOk9co1g8F5qQsJRuneWY cTru+rkLygjgt4S2DlfGFXeG6Zkdmu4eyD9ei2chEpGddHJ6OXHHYb22xxCvAvrZKatp cfHtRBiej/9WS8KXWaMG2dcJwgNjp1OZrAS8u+iD23xL5GBzAsCx1POZX92jSeSadyvr ctHQUdnHDTDP32fxbGJPq4jbyMTxkPYJGGE+DkIx3KqDWI1Iiv+KJRkjHqJypJ5E/cU1 QpLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=clwtGF1qxRcJdvFRg72esgnt3w2me7MoYagIlzP5nUU=; b=YFdrxM9jDu2mxERoY31/4RP0NhSERq+ih+uxzTKR/rC3bocgj1T14x8G2b9m6LSqCE YcJObH1A6R9l13c1ltqMklmASbPmot+ean1tC7F/VLQmzfREaXbioxDTMVxd4jGAs7Kh G3wNH9UsRok/JUlRAHQwK9xxPVFzPZTZLIMdSOChKBFxDF0Dl/wmZaEpOkYG21kvLy9D ClSDWrjNJ0c+ntmgMOIGj4t/pk1jcTMMwKkOeIgdJ/vT0y/nMyCqPThMlMDhpjkupjED eO1WF1oem81TckvWJENuOxMF9RpsnAdHIM9e5UcrFaqQXIuKvWs2A/NHUijlcklrNhW+ QZiQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKVYve+ReQvySvMhT7+Mzhjjn/nLfJSvJks0zRcoy3NGz7bAWOp 5VsmVUZMAfCfIUQPaKkoXdU4FnYmjGOUURhgwvbL2vXA
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eDzLiTiifphn4NWGGiHJ/s64RYo6EVj3tgRMBoZ/GF2sIc/Mf1JAYbJh5u8bKeeGxHyDx34984mpFLbTwN6UI=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:56c8:: with SMTP id b8mr833289otj.306.1542035855961; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:17:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:17:22 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMMTW_+5XM7QAhSZU=W_hxpyX-uAqjHX2dG9a9ypV0FeoX7naA@mail.gmail.com>
To: alto@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006cf522057a793391"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/o5AuLzB3Ww6Wb5kFYILrT5FuwIs>
Subject: [alto] Reminder: Poll for virtual interim
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:17:39 -0000

Folks: On Nov 1, we had opened up a poll to determine when to have the
virtual interim for ALTO.   Understandably, the intervening IETF meeting in
Bangkok soaked up cycles for many participants and they may have missed the
email to the list.

We do, however, need to finalize a date.  There are two possible dates that
we could hold the meeting on:

1/ Mon, Dec 10 2018 @ 1300 CET / 0600 US Central
2/ Tue, Dec 11 2018 @ 1300 CET / 0600 US Central  *** seems to be preferred
by those who have voted so far

Please proceed to the Doodle poll (link below) and pick an option:

Please ensure that you give preference to the date where there is already a
mass of folks gathering.  Currently, Tue, Dec 11 is the preferred date as
all who have expressed an opinion have chosen Tue, Dec. 11.

Jan and I will like to solicit additional responses in case you were not
able to respond before.  Please indicate your response by middle of this
week.  At the end of Wed (US Central time), the final votes will be counted
and a specific date from the two chosen.  Logistic details will then follow.


- vijay