[alto] Reminder: cost-calendar is under 2nd WGLC

Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com> Wed, 17 July 2019 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F7C120409 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 06:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8otxNJAOEtm for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 06:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBE9E120407 for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 06:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id m30so10881823pff.8 for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 06:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BHQWfOCa7adnBzEPItwZPo210j5S7mHYEGw9/8tohSY=; b=SV+HCbyyyzBLN6/W+mfICrMtgSHu1R2pbqvNJ5bkJZZZM4HcrzkiomoKDuxwmQGkmu dneyMo9l1BhlVD114pj3CnVJfjlyR4DfpktHTFVAsbTkER2tcafk4QR4UJr/0PLzC1XU FGtqZkVJ8PKBTyb0HuF2ZNa12eFibobl4eTy4ma9bChlrln1PONEsq6DYCxvRabB0QQb 3x390AMkHE1ZdUUvz17N3mBXja9ZgJS5dxf9Sl8q35vzcLFwvSzj5/AwjOrkSjBvlFJn RF3hdR3Cp9BQg/RsOCVU7e29vfLEQWqFpF3VsQBGbRb6kLhHp9h2MbWj9Fbyy+3sPuV+ sdFA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BHQWfOCa7adnBzEPItwZPo210j5S7mHYEGw9/8tohSY=; b=WjgFbKBBg0bdl+5ub5nUXAUVCN8DWAmizq3G9kpBXczd7fNGdpApOX19e82R22dFqs Q4/LWbpmdSUlr+m2TFpUG39/IPOtNeqyZsmosQjzMA6N3HdORsAg9zCKUrFhmevcKrsN TgBRTH/ZokzwGVBJoAJDGeLoC5MNjuEBkbL7cQeRkeMx8nT3yYlbjTF4gJ7UkabWYdos bf0SPHwIOH5Az67U5GVs9bnSxQZDQrwnLZgLtlGkAml+xpK3+kYqnjCBoCV/UEntxSso eY2hzS8UN1mYUxQt2/SKf+fxYKZqma7I91k+FhPCPHe7SYlylaqbC641aEAKcAGivcDf kMlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXPnKRPZPmgrsn8txMu8GIMAvU8uDMh+qWiVVS9ohNCJ+WMq/i4 F5AewgYLSk4tMt8nYdHAOGZucsQgkfbForGppfl3mbA4
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyVvaPbV06xhv8+MMsuyGjsZY8YC2dJyhMmGpvK1tsjwdRbpKAWyGMFDM6/+bYnyAivw+/b6reb7BJgSaYkdyk=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:381d:: with SMTP id f29mr41946684pga.101.1563371420601; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 06:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 08:49:49 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMMTW_LigkipopxAerzA+NLV4fniGJ8V-v8qcKKd-yijTghTcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002d51b7058de0c64f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/qGlMG_vL9x2bpiSaifoxzkjvQUQ>
Subject: [alto] Reminder: cost-calendar is under 2nd WGLC
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 13:50:24 -0000

All: Please be mindful that cost-calendar is under a second WGLC that
expires on Jul-21 [1].

We need some feedback from the WG on the changes that have been made to the
draft to address the IESG comments that resulted in the second WGLC.

Even a quick indication on the list saying you approve (or disapprove) of
the changes after you have read the new version is appreciated.  You don't
have to read the whole draft, just looking at the diffs is fine.

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/Etrq53moSZsPUlLlijIJ8cd_pa8

Thanks,

- vijay