IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [alto] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: (with DISCUSS)

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 06 December 2018 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D1F130F15; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 10:53:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.385
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.385 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.514] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hBfuMSP-than; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 10:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F359130F0D; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 10:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ict-networks-2001-067c-10ec-5785-8000-0000-0000-0430.fwd-v6.ethz.ch ([2001:67c:10ec:5785:8000::430]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1gUylo-0006Gw-Pi; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 19:53:08 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR07MB32369E7948526611501A97F495A90@AM4PR07MB3236.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 19:53:06 +0100
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "alto-chairs@ietf.org" <alto-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>, "Gurbani, Vijay (Nokia - US/Naperville)" <vijay.gurbani@nokia.onmicrosoft.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3E37EE62-DC28-4BD9-923D-D8E825A20C3A@kuehlewind.net>
References: <154404682585.31877.15741071890095313862.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F8F1800D-30B0-441A-A98F-0F049B3B98E6@kuehlewind.net> <CAMMESsxSxTuzWsiGLZvZ9m50tvbTqhkjvDSCoh716A2Hc0pt+g@mail.gmail.com> <AM4PR07MB32369E7948526611501A97F495A90@AM4PR07MB3236.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1544122390;76086ebe;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1gUylo-0006Gw-Pi
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/qQkVaA525bHY5HXmY8xRz_JzzhQ>
Subject: Re: [alto] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 18:53:12 -0000

Hi Sabine,

thanks for confirming this. I have set the „replaces“ field in the datatracker now correctly and the IPR shows up respectively.

Vijay, can you update the shepherd write up and re-run the wg last call with a note to the working group that this IPR exists?

Sabine, maybe you can also address the other comments from the IESG in a new revision before we re-start WG last call, especially the use of examples IP addresses as flagged by Suresh and Adam, and use of https as flagged by Alissa and Adam. I think Ben’s discuss needs further discussion before we can update. Please reply to his email as well as soon as possible!

Thanks!

Mirja



> Am 06.12.2018 um 19:31 schrieb Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>:
> 
> Hello,
>  
> I confirm that the IPR attached to draft-randriamasy-alto-cost-calendar still applies to draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar.
> I also attach the IPR declaration that I sent on June 7th
> Please let me know what I can do to help resolving this issue.
>  
> Sabine
>  
>  
>  
> From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> 
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2018 4:14 PM
> To: Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
> Cc: alto-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar@ietf.org; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>; alto@ietf.org; Gurbani, Vijay (Nokia - US/Naperville) <vijay.gurbani@nokia.onmicrosoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [alto] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-09: (with DISCUSS)
>  
> Perfect!
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Alvaro.
>  
> On December 6, 2018 at 8:53:38 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) (ietf@kuehlewind.net) wrote:
> 
> I will check with authors and chairs, however it could also be the cause that the IPR was not applicable to the wg doc anymore, as there have been quite some changes to the -01 version of the draft (when the IPR was filed) and the adopted version. 
> 
> If that is not the case, we will re-issue wg and IETF last call and bring it back. 
> <Mail-Anhang.eml>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email