[alto] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-18: (with COMMENT)

[Barry Leiba via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar-18: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-calendar/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks, Sabine, for addressing my comments!

There's just one minor thing still outstanding.  It's not a big deal, but the
RFC Editor will raise it and it will save time later if you deal with it now:

The terminology section makes a point of citing the significance of the
capitalization of "Client" and "Server", so it would be good to check the
document for consistent usage of the capitalized terms, as I see quite a number
of other such cases.  You did fix the one I called out specifically (in Section
3.1), but I still see a bunch of cases of "client" and "server" that are not
capitalized, and that I think should be.  Please do check and correct the
consistency.