Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com> Fri, 13 November 2020 19:56 UTC
Return-Path: <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4553A0147 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:56:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gfknk388U_4H for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:56:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb29.google.com (mail-yb1-xb29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 834D73A0141 for <alto@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:56:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb29.google.com with SMTP id l14so5656788ybq.3 for <alto@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:56:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=H0k60nZh5xBfIZl4cQ5BVlyGa19RSFTca6lUGAd0rFw=; b=vCqLUgoOM4YC1DCGI4PyFhdoqhoo9FopN9iuQXVwer+JyqkHJemn7ZP+CXIH4/kZjG Aq6rllMXw++OYENNaV6kYBRUOJAxiMIJV4BxcyVW26Ydm902Abx4dcvRl/WuYDD4CJEq 5z/K+5Dd7OQ+nJe8em+FZ2fGx+YeBL8n/zvQhf2N6Ky/FanOGTo6KkHBKwMzkomgYgOH /V9OiJffdTbJMNGQNDxe58Tl2PK7QErvAz82YZ8Y2k0xeWI6PJVsjFTWKwFhAMZMn432 GoePF4V2uZcMtDrZrHQ5644PNgFujQnyaiE+MLP8OsMxC5Z7askBmEK5bwhen6ShsoCi gZKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H0k60nZh5xBfIZl4cQ5BVlyGa19RSFTca6lUGAd0rFw=; b=k7/6TbwpkCDwoApj3LDfX2R7ZYtLksXc4YFaAds4RywchK7QRg2KMqUSffAd+UE2ej pzPHKcgcHRCiqwQvT2u69Q3QkmBF8s8YwpArBPObcMdz1y70cdDdEd8aGUmgzTaRR6Ku c5/TMKMXy7lCdWFNw8eI8SWe9gDDFm+cgArilo+a8LqiONoSrap+3hEhpxPqNjugNedc Rw5HtiKKH5qyLdLmZMIsKz3kQNxuMDD2ZZjQn137SuOjLSwjbBu/WBm73bNieVP55Tr7 jSVafFpfMzBQKgSQzK+uVeJ5gZhRUsXBCejlVUc9uoE0DJnjH7tjCsxksN3OECtIHiIV HNuA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530I+HS35hxrWHwcTrDtHG3RymB3PloRGwHk3MD+3wLeb6yPKnrN Af6km+K4vC9Tm46eQz9uYZl514KD2hYJbno7dZ6DN4Yp
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznuBiOs8rO8BGqaKC85Ij8sYlczUSDeXzzeUMbDpsfI1ZQ/Gudy7SrflyqAhcDMeNq7wf+k4ddQYOcGAajq6c=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:8250:: with SMTP id d16mr5400725ybn.133.1605297384613; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:56:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMMTW_LAKfPYiD3PFveRAoHe+_WxxU6McRsMzKDVrg5T87j6Yg@mail.gmail.com> <PR3PR07MB70187439187DB78D878381F095E70@PR3PR07MB7018.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CANUuoLqSLLXTnrXRvepDYv3zDtsLYEjKZt1bKDbn_A4-oMy+4g@mail.gmail.com> <DB749E27-861A-4387-919F-CCF8A238D221@wdroome.com> <CAAbpuyoQD1C3YnLhh+1vQO8A9P5kWy1bzfQQB29EJeMsa4uqKw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAbpuyoQD1C3YnLhh+1vQO8A9P5kWy1bzfQQB29EJeMsa4uqKw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:55:50 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMMTW_LKgJhqVLVZXXkVT-Q_4G5wXBfvLZ7PiVXv1kG2WLnAVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jensen Zhang <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005e6d7705b4026cda"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/tH4Cmfvm8WDVXxfz0wsIbuU3yIw>
Subject: Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, path-vector
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:56:27 -0000
Dear Jensen: Thank you, this is excellent information. You don't have to hurry up your release schedule due to my query. I just want to document the implementations that are in the path of progress, or have been implemented (even on older releases of the I-Ds). Also, thanks to Richard, Sabine, Wendy for getting back to me on implementations as well. I think I have all I need for the shepherd writeups. Cheers, - vijay On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 9:18 PM Jensen Zhang <jingxuan.n.zhang@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > Sorry for my late reply. > > I want to mention that Kai and I are implementing the latest version of > these three documents. The implementation will be open-source on GitHub > [1]. But it is still in progress. We may have a release by the next IETF. > > As Richard mentioned, we have an implementation for a very early version > of the path vector document [2]. It is only for OpenFlow-based networks. > And we didn't integrate unified properties. > > I remember Danny also has an implementation of the unified properties > document. > > [1] https://github.com/openalto/sextant > [2] https://github.com/openalto/mercator-setup > > Best, > Jensen > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 5:30 AM Wendy Roome <wendy@wdroome.com> wrote: > >> Vijay, >> >> >> >> My server did support PID properties and allowed endpoints to inherit >> them, and had a “get-all-props” extension. >> >> >> >> But it didn’t implement the current version. >> >> >> >> - Wendy >> >> >> >> *From: *alto <alto-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Y. Richard Yang" < >> yry@cs.yale.edu> >> *Date: *Thu, November 12, 2020 at 12:58 >> *To: *"Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" < >> sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com> >> *Cc: *IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org> >> *Subject: *Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, >> path-vector >> >> >> >> Hi Vijay, >> >> >> >> - I believe that there was an implementation of unified properties by >> Wendy Roome. But it is for an earlier version, not the latest one which we >> just posted. >> >> >> >> - I understand that there was an implementation of path vector used in >> super computing demonstration; but it was for an earlier version of path >> vector without the integration of unified properties. >> >> >> >> Richard >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:43 PM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - >> FR/Paris-Saclay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Vijay, >> >> >> >> To my knowledge, >> >> >> >> - there is no implementation of Unified Properties that reflects the >> latest design updates, defined in 2019 and 2020, >> >> - I am not aware of any implementation of Path Vector. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Sabine >> >> >> >> *From:* alto <alto-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Vijay Gurbani >> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 11, 2020 5:57 PM >> *To:* IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org> >> *Subject:* [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto-cdni, >> path-vector >> >> >> >> All: I am the shepherd for the three drafts identified in the subject. >> >> >> >> As I prepare the shepherd writeup, I will like to document if there are >> any implementations of these three drafts that the WG members are aware >> of. These implementations can be private (a few individuals working on the >> drafts), or be more formal with a GitHub repository and a larger community. >> >> >> >> If any WG member is aware of implementations, please let me know. Please >> drop me an email (or post on the list) with the details as you know them. >> I would like to kindly ask you to do this as soon as possible --- >> preferably by the end of this week --- to allow me to prepare the shepherd >> writeup. >> >> >> >> Thank you. >> >> >> >> - vijay >> >> _______________________________________________ >> alto mailing list >> alto@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> >> -- >> >> Richard >> >> _______________________________________________ alto mailing list >> alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> _______________________________________________ >> alto mailing list >> alto@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >> > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto >
- [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, alto… Vijay Gurbani
- Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, … Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, … Y. Richard Yang
- Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, … Wendy Roome
- Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, … Jensen Zhang
- Re: [alto] Any implementations of unified-props, … Vijay Gurbani