[alto] ALTO deployment considerations and map calculation draft

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Wed, 28 October 2015 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F97D1B57A6 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z7-UYdynzzV7 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82DB61B5799 for <alto@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us70tusmtp2.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.64]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 766BCDFA47251; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:42:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by us70tusmtp2.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t9SFgOJt028295 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:42:26 GMT
Received: from [135.185.238.169] (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.169]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id t9SFgE4s017731; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:42:14 -0500 (CDT)
To: "michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com" <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>, Hans Seidel <hseidel@benocs.com>
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Message-ID: <5630ECD6.9030101@bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:42:14 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/wCdNIO6AxWUYns2A8z39oiXYBxU>
Cc: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Subject: [alto] ALTO deployment considerations and map calculation draft
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:42:32 -0000

Michael, Hans: Pursuant to our virtual meeting yesterday, I have been
thinking whether Hans' draft [1] has any input that can go into
Michael's deployment draft [2]?

Can I kindly request the authors to inform the working group if there
is any beneficial overlap from [1] that we may take into [2]?  I
realize that [2] has been through WGLC so I am not expecting
large-scale changes in it.  But if there is any deployment-related
experience from [1] that can be put into [2], we should do our due
diligence and make sure that we reflect that experience.

Thanks!

[1] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-seidel-alto-map-calculation/
[2] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-deployments/

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq