Re: [alto] Need to move SSE to WGLC, but ...

Dawn Chan <> Mon, 11 June 2018 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6F2130E13 for <>; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 01:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.126
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rcUCkzZ4LwaX for <>; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 01:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76794130E0D for <>; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 01:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=SfFoj2wVS7UNDYvgLZt7iRbDzqOIrEOyAImqt7VU2xY=; b=bULRg82eU6+3R9L+dv7+gXQegp3tguNLaFPjfmI0bxu9kSWzXJm1KrKBmv7QGNC8qWhPnFTNR5FEMcSb/RSr/052BfxPk3m/NmqSl5D0afM3dY10DOjG0vCAOptVVEywJLKBmBsXucMoq4AxJWqmOqIBkURdLQpQr+eRU2Q242LCgUN5391faLC7/FTjPbSl7QnxY8reUFMGpNbf+gpktbjoKFuvTW8fchPm7mHWJ5rKGoOvbiX0Cqi6YkKX5IwYHVEFjuu1QfsyswJ7WanIQUEyuKz0VZfTN81+ONZ2rZ02lTaQcqi/sMjHMay104tcWG3y6CMDoVGhJdq8239u+Q==
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.20.863.11; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 08:47:48 +0000
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.20.863.11 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 08:47:48 +0000
Received: from ([fe80::60e1:2316:9c1a:4d36]) by ([fe80::60e1:2316:9c1a:4d36%3]) with mapi id 15.20.0841.019; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 08:47:48 +0000
From: Dawn Chan <>
To: "Y. Richard Yang" <>, "Gurbani, Vijay (Nokia - US)" <>
Thread-Topic: [alto] Need to move SSE to WGLC, but ...
Thread-Index: AQHT/zn+YiZeNZXmJkOa25SzsmP4KKRYWasAgAJo2yM=
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 08:47:48 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>, <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:2533B98D3949C303A28388D86885DD1E0FE2CAAECB778304F29AEAC623806CD7; UpperCasedChecksum:F181BCE0EC18E7C15FE6549AB9E2A1DBE8B607936147D24D85C7750298D604DF; SizeAsReceived:7177; Count:46
x-tmn: [R5m2MQ0k36EbFI2ydSAOxWy6j/rHcQet]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1NAM02HT062; 7:nerG6BfPFhgqsr54x6GTFi9EN+rMzPVi2kzmMzmgPwHDF+XFt/9SRKma7SYiDgxVdL+aUmisb9V4HQr8w6tww/yTE0PGFNQpia47z7qLF8+xxMzinkjfKnjSGb+0v6KIpK0f2INPKW3xysenpjgUlPMuHcFHzsFIgnyNFHGoPS12Tv+XqQuSDoCX1ftVER3HZIAjFm2C6sVBPnIcr5e+L5ks3XcFNMrrWl/DUv8AtBx6fznIx4HDQSqMgSP3ydRm
x-incomingheadercount: 46
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:(109105607167333)(17574466456847); BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1603101448)(1601125500)(1701031045); SRVR:CY1NAM02HT062;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY1NAM02HT062:
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:CY1NAM02HT062; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1NAM02HT062;
x-forefront-prvs: 070092A9D3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(199004)(189003)(51914003)(53376002)(11609785009)(76176011)(73972006)(6506007)(2171002)(59450400001)(102836004)(9686003)(6246003)(14454004)(6346003)(26005)(20460500001)(6436002)(966005)(68736007)(104016004)(476003)(446003)(97736004)(5660300001)(486006)(53366004)(53546011)(11346002)(2900100001)(3660700001)(8676002)(3280700002)(110136005)(33656002)(87572001)(8656006)(99286004)(5250100002)(81156014)(83332001)(8936002)(6306002)(55016002)(4326008)(229853002)(74316002)(7696005)(1720100001)(305945005)(105586002)(86362001)(25786009)(106356001)(82202002)(15852004)(4068875011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1NAM02HT062;; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:;
received-spf: None ( does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is );
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 2Y2VbGHkcJvB1VyrB6cOoSNYbp5RwUtuNCeu2lXbsbiFTDMlgn+qdppwe7q/Mwdn1OoaALBQe92O0tUim+0/Gyi84z3nNiuseVpGl4lZZlJCQOhC4ARnUBdj7z7ZsR0aO5qeyVAOB7R++aL0TlgLz3+ecGo1YfTKXe4LNEKNH57YPO4ATldJ5jxEltNzT7bT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 13d3b255-904b-4e34-4f69-08d5cf780288
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: d4d70346-2c10-4f39-8c00-e767963926d9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 13d3b255-904b-4e34-4f69-08d5cf780288
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: d4d70346-2c10-4f39-8c00-e767963926d9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Jun 2018 08:47:48.7635 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1NAM02HT062
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [alto] Need to move SSE to WGLC, but ...
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 08:47:53 -0000

Hi Vijay,

Thanks for the reply, it is a good point that the result should also be sent in the update stream service.

Besides, there is another point that the result should also be sent in the update stream service. If the server process requests asynchronously, when it receives the request from the client and insert it in its queue, it will first send a response back to the client; and after the server successfully processed the request, it will send a reply via the update stream service. This case requires the server to indicate the state of the “remove” operation in the reply. A simple attribute “state” with type JSON boolean in the UpdateStream ControlEvent can solve the concern. If "state" is false, the operation fails; if "state" is true, the operation succeeds.

object {
        [String control-uri;]
        [Boolean state;]
        [String remove<1..*>;]
} UpdateStreamControlEvent;

This is my idea for option 2.

Wish to hear opinions from others in the group.

Best Wishes,

From: alto <> on behalf of Y. Richard Yang <>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2018 3:57:14 AM
To: Gurbani, Vijay (Nokia - US)
Subject: Re: [alto] Need to move SSE to WGLC, but ...

Dear Vijay, Jan,

Thank you so much. It is a wonderful idea to check the WG for additional comments on the mentioned issues. The authors will address suggestions, if any, and then move the document forward.


On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:04 AM Vijay K. Gurbani <<>> wrote:
Folks: Jan and I would like to move SSE [1] to WGLC.

Looking at the mailing list, we note that the authors are asking input
from the WG on an issue in SSE [2].

We would kindly request the WG to spend some time thinking about the
question being asked in [2] and to chime in with some thoughts.

Assuming that there is no response by next week on this, the authors can
proceed with their default position on this, for which they have an
articulated reason in [2].

Jan and I will follow up next week and if there has not been any further
list discussion on this, we will move the work ahead to WGLC.



- vijay
Vijay K. Gurbani /<>
Network Data Science, Nokia Networks

alto mailing list<>

| Y. Richard Yang <<>>   |
| Professor of Computer Science       |
|        |