[ANCP] Review of draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-09.txt
Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Fri, 29 June 2012 20:10 UTC
Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 6C19A21F85A4 for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZWqqabISfOVR for
<ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com
[209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FE821F859E for
<ancp@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yenq13 with SMTP id q13so3468089yen.31 for <ancp@ietf.org>;
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-antivirus :x-antivirus-status;
bh=jSfV1o0XlZiCPf/Xdbf1W/Nr2iJXuu2ZX/OGM8xcRzM=;
b=tVYoSNEaH4JAz1s2I11go1SJo8Re+0XA/3JN++a/U20sSmiXKvdmvv+emkOhoN4Dx+
24T+y6izKDHUNyA4QsmT35Y1E8DSUxnWtU2S6r6VTypsZWmqQ3tstG2BaPZ3F8G+kgPy
ITEIq+41lqQV4vaf8tM+rKedLbET3Ji2jlXxW403VOTqTpzspGFKJpBYrZVCsvhPThTh
GvDV7Lm9rVH/Oa3IWbh+qcLaMdsWNn3bRrQE/+dcrpNQefCpXGMFif64PC+5q8K02DI6
xrbk2nWJEVkBxPzyEUzAJOZukt44fF+4wrwoAYDQXCoWB1aaAVx/Ngbr0vuUX6qKjfs8 wCWQ==
Received: by 10.100.206.2 with SMTP id d2mr1353762ang.74.1341000599465;
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dsl-173-206-19-146.tor.primus.ca.
[173.206.19.146]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
z42sm8016419yhd.1.2012.06.29.13.09.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FEE0B95.3090401@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:09:57 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ancp@ietf.org" <ancp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120629-1, 29/06/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: [ANCP] Review of draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-09.txt
X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list
<ancp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ancp>,
<mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ancp>
List-Post: <mailto:ancp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>,
<mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:10:00 -0000
I reviewed this document. With the qualification that I have little MIB experience, it looks pretty good. I did wonder whether aggregate counts of failure responses should be broken out for debugging purposes, the idea being that a rising aggregate failure count might be a trigger for further investigation. Is there already a MIB to track per-line results? How do additional capabilities (e.g., the languishing-in-limbo multiplexing capabilities) get added? Tom Taylor
- [ANCP] Review of draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-09.txt Tom Taylor
- Re: [ANCP] Review of draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-09.txt DE CNODDER, STEFAAN (STEFAAN)