Re: [ANCP] IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon
<HaagT@telekom.de> Wed, 12 September 2012 11:11 UTC
Return-Path: <HaagT@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 248DA21F855B for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5M0sgpD7o33p for
<ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail73.telekom.de (tcmail73.telekom.de [217.243.239.135]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B27921F8564 for <ancp@ietf.org>;
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 04:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from he111628.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.93.20]) by
tcmail71.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 12 Sep 2012 13:11:22 +0200
Received: from HE111649.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.93.18]) by
HE111628.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([::1]) with mapi;
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:11:21 +0200
From: <HaagT@telekom.de>
To: <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>, <draft-ietf-ancp-pon@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:11:20 +0200
Thread-Topic: IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon
Thread-Index: Ac2Q0fwlpUh+4PDXQVqRVKLyo/3wHgAAab4g
Message-ID: <EBDD2E088274B14BA201104F444C8E4E96431146C5@HE111649.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <CC76236A.3409B%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <CC76236A.3409B%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_EBDD2E088274B14BA201104F444C8E4E96431146C5HE111649emea1_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: ancp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ANCP] IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon
X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list
<ancp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ancp>,
<mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ancp>
List-Post: <mailto:ancp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>,
<mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:11:29 -0000
Referring to your request I am not aware of any relevant new IPR that has not already been disclosed. Regards Thomas ________________________________ Von: ancp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ancp-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. September 2012 12:33 An: draft-ietf-ancp-pon@tools.ietf.org Cc: ancp@ietf.org Betreff: [ANCP] IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon Before forwarding the latest version of this draft back to the IESG, I need to poll for knowledge of any additional IPR that applies to this drafts, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not already been disclosed. This draft will not be forwarded to the IESG until a response has been received from each author and contributor. Best regards Matthew
- [ANCP] IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)
- Re: [ANCP] IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon HaagT
- Re: [ANCP] IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon Hongyu Li (Julio)
- Re: [ANCP] IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon Bitar, Nabil N
- Re: [ANCP] IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon Wadhwa, Sanjay (Sanjay)