IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ANCP] Progressing draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt

"Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com> Wed, 13 February 2013 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <flefauch@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52D921F8794 for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:19:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F66h-iBHxGOb for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:19:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C019F21F877B for <ancp@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:19:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5686; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1360772394; x=1361981994; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=tZwdkmQmEgvzbdCihkeqsRBtRjWPtTnd6MATh4hZq2M=; b=ePRsXQTH9bSckoKgtQK7HfA7ish/5bKSxdI36cWAoz9pvSgDCUcchfAn OT9/O48fFEu4iMYzCXLepVdupEpRjHAnKippX94QqCjGl2IKKa2PWHTpU Reb7j13cWTabKs3j/6hVGy5hgGa7bS74DpXU4QwM3Fn0lff3OPsuU9UXS I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAMK7G1GtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABFwG4Wc4IfAQEBBAEBAWsQCwIBCBgKHQchBgsUEQIEEwiHeAMPDLULDYlXBIw2gQSDaWEDiDCMG40ZhRODBoFyNQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.84,658,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="176682655"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2013 16:19:54 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1DGJsBj019708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ancp@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:19:54 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.195]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:19:54 -0600
From: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>
To: "ancp@ietf.org" <ancp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ANCP] Progressing draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOCfc35hS1gM6oGU6y5K8xVn1JlZh4V4eAgAABq4CAAANcAA==
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:19:53 +0000
Message-ID: <FC236DA6F2DA77449EF2D02DF4471A8D3753D7@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
References: <CD4154EE.3E148%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> <20130213160153.GG30497@cisco.com> <CAKOT5Ko7doykpY4s0XF4RScfH2bK67tKUJJv58QbjmfT5azcBA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKOT5Ko7doykpY4s0XF4RScfH2bK67tKUJJv58QbjmfT5azcBA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.55.161.199]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FC236DA6F2DA77449EF2D02DF4471A8D3753D7xmbrcdx10ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [ANCP] Progressing draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt
X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list <ancp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ancp>
List-Post: <mailto:ancp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:19:55 -0000

Hello,

I support publication.
I am aware of a commercial implementation of a subset of that spec.
I am a co-author of that spec.

Francois

On 13 Feb 2013, at 17:07, Roberta Maglione <robmgl.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:robmgl.ietf@gmail.com>>
 wrote:

Support as one of co-authors.

Regards
Roberta


On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com<mailto:eckert@cisco.com>> wrote:
I support for this document to progress to RFC.
Thanks a lot for this long but good work!

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:34:23PM +0000, Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) wrote:
>    Working group
>    Due to the lack of discussion on the list of this draft during the two
>    working group last calls, the chairs and ADs would like to see support for
>    progressing this draft expressed on the list. Since this has been through
>    two working group last calls, then next logical step would be submission
>    to the IESG.
>    If you support progressing this draft to RFC, then please reply to the
>    ANCP email list expressing your support.
>    Equally, if you do not support progressing the draft, please reply to the
>    list, stating your reasons.
>    In either case, please send any comments to the list.
>    We will close this poll on 27th Feb 2013.
>    If there is consensus for progress the draft, then I will do the document
>    shepherd review and write-up.
>    Bets regards
>    Matthew

> _______________________________________________
> ANCP mailing list
> ANCP@ietf.org<mailto:ANCP@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp
_______________________________________________
ANCP mailing list
ANCP@ietf.org<mailto:ANCP@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp

_______________________________________________
ANCP mailing list
ANCP@ietf.org<mailto:ANCP@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email