IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ANCP] IPR check for draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-10.txt

"Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com> Sat, 09 November 2013 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <flefauch@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BF421E805F for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:17:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dTKl53oqXllL for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:17:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D7E11E80DE for <ancp@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 16:17:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5052; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383956242; x=1385165842; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=AngLrA0V0o9xFSdsOQAE6su4xj8s56oBgVGfJxJJVPs=; b=U24PpM1G5ZZnIF8SBm5Vmtkb2WhfPJu6LWr5VvLD1cKhktua5c3drp9n p5hIdD6DPdlXidXmhTrdRWeh/2F65GnIFrCwN80QsJgnOWDs8TyKdt1x3 nLNKjhuker+P8OSS99NCN8vDwdOCnouk40ZJBkg3EsR95dicWI+mHswmi c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsFACp+fVKtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABZgkNEOFO/FYEvFnSCJgEBBAEBAWsLEAIBCD8HJwsUEQIEDgWIAQ29GgSOHoFJB4MggRADmA+SC4MmgXE5
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,663,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="282664458"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2013 00:17:22 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com [173.37.183.85]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA90HMd8017435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:17:22 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.47]) by xhc-rcd-x11.cisco.com ([173.37.183.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 18:17:21 -0600
From: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Thread-Topic: [ANCP] IPR check for draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-10.txt
Thread-Index: AQHO3BlrzJQvjGXHpkWqg3ntuRPqlZocbn4A
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:17:20 +0000
Message-ID: <307F492D-0BE1-4A1D-9678-313001FCF436@cisco.com>
References: <CEA1E08C.57299%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <CEA1E08C.57299%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.44.210.82]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_307F492D0BE14A1D9678313001FCF436ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions@tools.ietf.org>, "ancp@ietf.org" <ancp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ANCP] IPR check for draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-10.txt
X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list <ancp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ancp>
List-Post: <mailto:ancp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:17:28 -0000

Hello,
I am not aware of IPR related to draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-10.
Francois

On 8 Nov 2013, at 01:28, "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote:

Authors,

We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-10.txt, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

Please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. Publication for this draft will not be requested until a response has been received from each author.

Regards

Matthew
_______________________________________________
ANCP mailing list
ANCP@ietf.org<mailto:ANCP@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email