IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ANCP] Progressing draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt

"Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 13 February 2013 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989BC21F8745 for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:34:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08GYfA3Ixe6d for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C9A21F861C for <ancp@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:34:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.64]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id r1DEVBgW015574 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <ancp@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:34:31 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.74) by FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (135.120.45.64) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:34:25 +0100
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.120]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:34:24 +0100
From: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "ancp@ietf.org" <ancp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Progressing draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOCfc35hS1gM6oGU6y5K8xVn1JlQ==
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:34:23 +0000
Message-ID: <CD4154EE.3E148%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.0.121105
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.12]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CD4154EE3E148matthewboccialcatellucentcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.80
Subject: [ANCP] Progressing draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt
X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list <ancp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ancp>
List-Post: <mailto:ancp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:34:33 -0000

Working group

Due to the lack of discussion on the list of this draft during the two working group last calls, the chairs and ADs would like to see support for progressing this draft expressed on the list. Since this has been through two working group last calls, then next logical step would be submission to the IESG.

If you support progressing this draft to RFC, then please reply to the ANCP email list expressing your support.

Equally, if you do not support progressing the draft, please reply to the list, stating your reasons.

In either case, please send any comments to the list.

We will close this poll on 27th Feb 2013.

If there is consensus for progress the draft, then I will do the document shepherd review and write-up.

Bets regards

Matthew

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email