Re: [ANCP] Review it or lose it!
"Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 25 October 2012 15:36 UTC
Return-Path: <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 7E99F21F8901 for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.641
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.641 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.608,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SAubvBxpJtxk for
<ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.56]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808BD21F8928 for <ancp@ietf.org>;
Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com
(FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail3.alcatel.fr
(8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id q9PFZVwr005264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3
cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:36:43 +0200
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSA3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.36]) by
FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.62]) with mapi;
Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:36:35 +0200
From: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>, "ancp@ietf.org" <ancp@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:36:35 +0200
Thread-Topic: [ANCP] Review it or lose it!
Thread-Index: Ac2yxoPYSkiZfcqrTOWowrnLBIPebw==
Message-ID: <CCAF1A08.37A61%matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <50895989.8020103@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.83
Subject: Re: [ANCP] Review it or lose it!
X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list
<ancp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ancp>,
<mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ancp>
List-Post: <mailto:ancp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>,
<mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:36:51 -0000
Folks, Just to reiterate Tom's call for review. We have had two WG last calls on this draft, but there has been little evidence that the draft has been widely reviewed at the time of the WG last calls. If you have read and are OK with the draft moving forward, please indicate this to the list. If you have comments, please indicate them to the list. If you have an implementation / deployment using these extensions, please review the draft, otherwise we will likely not be able to progress the draft and thus not be able to ask IANA to allocate the requisite code points, many of which require standards action. Best regards Matthew On 25/10/2012 16:23, "Tom Taylor" <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote: >I am advised that draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt will not advance >unless three people besides me review it. Since it involves IANA updates >requiring Standards Action, that means that without the necessary >reviews there will be NO standardized IANA codepoints for multicast. > >Tom Taylor >_______________________________________________ >ANCP mailing list >ANCP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp
- [ANCP] Review it or lose it! Tom Taylor
- Re: [ANCP] Review it or lose it! Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)