Re: [ANCP] comments on draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-10
Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Mon, 18 February 2013 15:52 UTC
Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 7106D21F88A8 for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:52:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.193
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.193 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.241,
BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wwA1W1PpK0ml for
<ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:52:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ia0-x22c.google.com (ia-in-x022c.1e100.net
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
DE73121F8886 for <ancp@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:52:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ia0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l29so3282671iag.3 for
<ancp@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:52:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
:x-antivirus:x-antivirus-status;
bh=I90TNRwsy9Ni2nLfg/M55wlRiuQaOcWHDpRMP38CSz0=;
b=PxuzZ8CLbaxxPZfvzM6AQFOt0eFpw6pVkA7x5OAaKoJUglgsuGg2mOoQsPVMRqXAC1
X70vtiJ09+zpU8CWQTEN1x480JD3h5pkmOLMxSrzV0ouD6ot9xWgzAJaX1fqqO4OFxuW
lqf/fii6gTa8nPnMWU1LPsqrIInhzZWVEy18jXWEi1jVnoPzfjD32zlfpfX2G8YUoiNc
D8q9QhL9uRJV87iTl+hdqdamOeIPXAUyDHqnKi6DhxSp2GMOFstt8KW4nYSPISDrdRp4
SLiuYFJQbjsTXrsIPb2vMK4wEpdeJ9harzEQUkaTMY6R+HFhnEaXWr1Mk8Oy9bVRysaB QMaw==
X-Received: by 10.50.88.228 with SMTP id bj4mr6803858igb.85.1361202760426;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:52:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dsl-207-112-82-191.tor.primus.ca.
[207.112.82.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
wv1sm8667469igb.0.2013.02.18.07.52.38 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA
bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:52:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <51224E46.3060809@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:52:38 -0500
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ancp@ietf.org
References: <19F346EB777BEE4CB77DA1A2C56F20B321DBAC@xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com>
<8FEE79F3EE86A244B0BDE68E90ED34DC07923282@ILPTWPVEXMB02.ecitele.com>
In-Reply-To: <8FEE79F3EE86A244B0BDE68E90ED34DC07923282@ILPTWPVEXMB02.ecitele.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130218-0, 18/02/2013), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [ANCP] comments on draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-10
X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list
<ancp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ancp>,
<mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ancp>
List-Post: <mailto:ancp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>,
<mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:52:41 -0000
Could I point out that the RFC 6320 does not talk about clients and servers? It talks about the AN and the NAS. And either side can initiate transactions, depending on the transaction, so I think the client-server terminology would actually be confusing. Sorry, I should have noted this point earlier. On 18/02/2013 8:50 AM, Moti Morgenstern wrote: > Hi, > > See inline my comments. > > Regards, > Moti > > -----Original Message----- > From: ancp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ancp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wojciech Dec (wdec) > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:11 PM > To: draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an@tools.ietf.org > Cc: ancp@ietf.org; ancp-chairs@tools.ietf.org > Subject: [ANCP] comments on draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-10 > > Hi All, > > Here's my review/feedback regarding the draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-10 draft: > > Section 4. > While it may be obvious, it likely would be useful to add that the ANCP Server MIB document is not scoped by this draft. Suggested text could be something like: > > "This document specifies a MIB module an ANCP client, such as an Access Node (AN). An ANCP server, such as a NAS, would be typically expected to implement an ANCP server MIB that is not covered by this document." > > **** MM: OK **** > > Section 5.4 (but applicable to whole document as it pops up throughout) It would be preferable to recast sentences such as "This table is used to configure ANCP sessions at the AN towards a > specific NAS" > > To: > This table is used to configure ANCP sessions at the ANCP client towards a > specific ANCP server. > > **** MM: OK **** > ...
- [ANCP] comments on draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-10 Wojciech Dec (wdec)
- Re: [ANCP] comments on draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-10 Moti Morgenstern
- Re: [ANCP] comments on draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-10 Tom Taylor
- Re: [ANCP] comments on draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-10 Wojciech Dec (wdec)
- Re: [ANCP] comments on draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-10 Tom Taylor
- Re: [ANCP] comments on draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-10 DE CNODDER, STEFAAN (STEFAAN)
- Re: [ANCP] comments on draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-10 Wojciech Dec (wdec)
- Re: [ANCP] comments on draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-10 DE CNODDER, STEFAAN (STEFAAN)