Re: [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-11
"Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <wdec@cisco.com> Thu, 07 November 2013 17:55 UTC
Return-Path: <wdec@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EA411E818D for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:55:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2pH8OkDbL6i5 for <ancp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D5D21E8140 for <ancp@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:54:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4762; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383846901; x=1385056501; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=WjRucgn6RCxoTPIFSlxrYnGCNasrTM6Xiscn87egXfA=; b=TFBcVcd0pYo92bPS7mkoVI9i/MurAhl0avW8OpvUjjEw99GDZbkgDhtZ D2kZNvx9csXRkKyvpEWJuenEiNfuDYrw2UqPwDFr2hM1AK/JQYlaHk0EV 6KUOo9AVU7khSjzKLNzdVdCJmvIENBEB0qS6vJMXHnRpxeDQMiVoQ8Egf Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcFABHTe1KtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABagwc4U78OgSUWdIIlAQEBBAEBARodNBcGAQgRBAEBAR4JKAYLFAkIAgQBEodvAw8NsmMNiWuMZ4E5gUAGhCoDliGBa4EviyOFOIMmgXE5
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,653,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="282074418"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2013 17:54:57 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA7Hsuco004613 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:54:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x05.cisco.com ([169.254.11.196]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 11:54:56 -0600
From: "Wojciech Dec (wdec)" <wdec@cisco.com>
To: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>, Moti Morgenstern <Moti.Morgenstern@ecitele.com>, "ancp@ietf.org" <ancp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-11
Thread-Index: AQHOqi9Ht0ftoae/nUOa6N2ejV2p3JnNXPeAgD2AroCAASOj4IAAFC9QgABg04CADl7ZAA==
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 17:54:55 +0000
Message-ID: <CEA19213.B3DF6%wdec@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <526FD3F3.9080506@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.7.130812
x-originating-ip: [10.61.98.45]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <567455145F1519419D1CB128F50C7F6A@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-11
X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list <ancp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ancp>
List-Post: <mailto:ancp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 17:55:07 -0000
Thanks. Wouldn't is help to document this in an updated version of the draft? This would conclude the WG-Last call as there appear to be no other open issues, and the next step would be (for me) to prepare the write-up for the IESG. Thanks. On 29/10/2013 16:27, "Tom Taylor" <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote: >Stefaan actually answered the question I intended. Essentially, the >answer is that walking the whole table is no big deal because it won't >be that large. Thanks, aand consider the matter cleared. > >tom > >On 29/10/2013 11:15 AM, Moti Morgenstern wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The question, if I understand it correctly, assumes that the >>ancpAnSessionUp notification reports the ancpAnCurrentSessionAnInstance >>only as a value (which means the management system does not know what >>session ID is involved). >> However, in SNMP each object (Variable Binding) in the PDU (no matter >>if that is a SET/GET message of a notification message) is actually more >>than just a value. >> >> Actually, each Variable Binding consists of 4 pieces of information: >> (1) The length of the Variable Binding instance in bytes [should the >>destination wish to jump over that Variable Binding block]. >> (2) The full OID of the Variable Binding instance (i.e., which means >>you got the ancpAnSessionConfigSessionId value embedded here) >> (3) The value type >> (4) The value >> >> I hope that this clears the question. >> >> Regards, >> Moti >> -----Original Message----- >> From: DE CNODDER, STEFAAN (STEFAAN) >>[mailto:stefaan.de_cnodder@alcatel-lucent.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:30 PM >> To: Moti Morgenstern >> Subject: FW: [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for >>draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-11 >> >> Hi Moti, >> >> Do you have an answer for the question below? Scanning the whole table >>does not look a big problem to me because I do not expect that many ANCP >>sessions in an AN, but still the question looks relevant for me if there >>is such a method to directly access the right row. >> >> Regards, >> Stefaan >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Wojciech Dec (wdec) [mailto:wdec@cisco.com] >> Sent: maandag 28 oktober 2013 15:05 >> To: draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an@tools.ietf.org >> Cc: ancp@ietf.org; Tom Taylor >> Subject: Re: [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for >>draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-11 >> >> Hi MIB-draft authors, >> >> Could you kindly reply to Tom's comments/questions. We can then close >>the last call. >> >> Regards, >> Wojciech. >> >> >> >> On 19/09/2013 13:52, "Tom Taylor" <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 05/09/2013 7:58 AM, Wojciech Dec (wdec) wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Starting from today we would like to initiate a week Working Group >>>> Last Call for the following draft: >>>> >>>> Access Node Control Protocol (ANCP) MIB module for Access Nodes >>>> >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ancp-mib-an-11 >>>> >>>> Accordingly, please review these documents and bring any remaining >>>> issues, or issues whose resolution is not satisfactory, to the >>>> attention of the Working Group on this list and/or by using the issue >>>> tracker tool. >>>> >>>> Please note that both of these parts has recently been substantially >>>> rewritten by Roy, just as I rewrote p6 a while back. As such, we're >>>> treating those changes as a proposal from the editors to the Working >>>> Group, to be confirmed. Please review carefully with this in mind. >>>> >>>> To give people ample time to review, we'll have a 3-week WGLC, ending >>>> on September 27. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Wojciech and Matthew. >>>> >>> >>> I have reviewed the latest version of this document. There are a couple >>> instances of non-native English syntax, but not enough to worry about. >>> In general the document looks good to go. >>> >>> I have one question regarding the ancpAnSessionUp notification. The >>> index to the session tables is ancpAnSessionConfigSessionId. How, then, >>> does one retrieve the data associated with the >>> ancpAnCurrentSessionAnInstance, which is buried in the >>> ancpAnCurrentSessionTabl? Is it necessary to walk the complete >>> ancpAnCurrentSessionTable (well, on the average, half the table) >>> applying a filter? >> >> >> >> This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains >>information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI >>Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform >>us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies >>thereof. >> >> >_______________________________________________ >ANCP mailing list >ANCP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp
- Re: [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf… Wojciech Dec (wdec)
- [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-anc… Wojciech Dec (wdec)
- Re: [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf… Tom Taylor
- Re: [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf… Wojciech Dec (wdec)
- Re: [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf… Moti Morgenstern
- Re: [ANCP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf… Tom Taylor