Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?

"Liubing (Leo)" <> Thu, 12 January 2017 03:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8737D129458 for <>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:10:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.419
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DE8tlEJj7UeL for <>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:10:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97BD512942F for <>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:10:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (EHLO ([]) by (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CYQ53673; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 03:10:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 03:10:11 +0000
Received: from ([fe80::40a8:f0d:c0f3:2ca5]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:10:06 +0800
From: "Liubing (Leo)" <>
To: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: CoAP mandatory?
Thread-Index: AQHSZm3bDBkyKdzxNEmKd2cHh6652KEwahAAgAPLTRA=
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 03:10:06 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2E96D65nkgeml514mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020202.5876F395.0204, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 411d640e55941bddbe3a99c4fd2643b9
Archived-At: <>
Cc: peter van der Stok <>, "Kumar, Sandeep" <>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 03:10:24 -0000

Hi Panos,

Thanks for your response.

So I guess once the new draft is adopted, BRSKI will choose the CoAP as mandatory, right?

Best regards,

From: Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) []
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:12 AM
To: Liubing (Leo);
Cc: peter van der Stok; Kumar, Sandeep
Subject: RE: CoAP mandatory?

Hi Bing,
I can’t answer your question on behalf of the BRSKI authors, but I wanted to share that we are starting a new draft to describe how BRSKI’s section 5.7.5 (ESToCOAP) will be done. We hope to get it adopted in ACE WG.

From: Anima-bootstrap [] On Behalf Of Liubing (Leo)
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 4:35 AM
Subject: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?

Hi Dear all,

The 04 draft has an editor note:

“ [[EDNOTE: The
   choice of CoAP as the mandatory to implement protocol rather than
   HTTP maximizes code reuse on the smallest of devices.  Unfortunately
   this means this document will have to include the EST over CoAP
   details as additional sections.  The alternative is to make 'HTTPS
   proxy' method the mandatory to implement and provide a less friendly
   environment for the smallest of devices.  This is a decision we'll
   have to see addressed by the broader team.]]
Does this open question already have a final conclusion?

Best regards,