Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 01 March 2017 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600A71296A2 for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:51:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VNyjH8AoSQkv for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:51:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D326B1294DA for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:51:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v218pCj2011824; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:51:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.0.1.13] (reingewinn.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.218.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3vY8LS1kwNzDGwL; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:51:12 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2EA4DDB@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:51:11 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 510051071.543913-e005731c590802c785a00d0a2cc58c17
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <07A8771E-0D92-40B2-B880-50EE58D816A1@tzi.org>
References: <6525c5f0b6e040b683ccd9c43b1c5e2f@VI1PR9003MB0237.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com> <14831.1481139454@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <d9aba3a07d14400f88f22329abc00128@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com> <CAH51uSdK_BHgFKXzpp2XJ4H9fEqkkLynFLjV5PTn6Y8EHSFz-g@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2E940C1@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com> <0c7b995c954746b8a58ae8a3399588ba@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2E96D65@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com> <27173.1488308037@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2EA4DDB@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
To: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-bootstrap/2mMPk7UMM99pMLANSxyGKPr5TDM>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "anima-bootstrap@ietf.org" <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>, peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>, "Panos Kampanakis \(pkampana\)" <pkampana@cisco.com>, "Kumar, Sandeep" <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?
X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <anima-bootstrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-bootstrap/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:51:37 -0000

On 1 Mar 2017, at 04:46, Liubing (Leo) <leo.liubing@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> [Bing] I didn't quite followed the relative discussion. Is this because that CoAP is seldom supported by Non-IoT devices (e.g. telecom boxes)? 

Well, ANIMA is rarely supported by Non-IoT devices either.
So you implement it.
(The afternoon you spend on implementing CoAP during that time is pretty much inconsequential in the big picture.)

Grüße, Carsten