Re: [Anima-bootstrap] ownership vouchers?

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Tue, 03 May 2016 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7043212DC98 for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2016 10:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ASps-HFu2gPp for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2016 10:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E97E12DBA2 for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2016 10:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895BE2002A for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2016 13:05:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C94863755 for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2016 13:00:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: anima-bootstrap <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <6B562CB4-0F89-4131-9785-6FBAA543D2FA@juniper.net>
References: <AC8506CD-B46D-4748-AE39-CE1DF93072BF@juniper.net> <664CAC1A-21DF-4CA4-A474-2E7CBD5412D0@cisco.com> <6B562CB4-0F89-4131-9785-6FBAA543D2FA@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <26093.1462294842.1@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 13:00:42 -0400
Message-ID: <26094.1462294842@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-bootstrap/3K0ucdOYzaJ7qxRTmlCC9LYk4UA>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] ownership vouchers?
X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <anima-bootstrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-bootstrap/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 17:05:53 -0000

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
    > Right, but if there were a standard format for Ownership Voucher, the
    > need to pass Vendor Class Identifier for DHCP, or the equivalent (if
    > there were one) for DNS, disappears.  This is my point for why the
    > NETCONF Zero Touch draft might like to see the Ownership Voucher

My feeling is that we should have one or more non-standard, Informational
documents on "Known Ownership Voucher".  Having the contents available for
review, will help understand the entire system.

I will write one.
I hope someone from Cisco would document what they do.

Again, not-standards track.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [