Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?

"Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com> Wed, 01 March 2017 08:56 UTC

Return-Path: <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D0D1294DA for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:56:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ufv0ak0kRe79 for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:56:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 196601294BF for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:56:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DBX40222; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:56:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:55:30 +0000
Received: from NKGEML514-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::40a8:f0d:c0f3:2ca5]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:55:24 +0800
From: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Thread-Topic: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?
Thread-Index: AQHSZm3bDBkyKdzxNEmKd2cHh6652KEwahAAgAPLTRCASl+ygIABF8qA///SIoCAAIa2MA==
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:55:23 +0000
Message-ID: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2EA8533@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <6525c5f0b6e040b683ccd9c43b1c5e2f@VI1PR9003MB0237.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com> <14831.1481139454@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <d9aba3a07d14400f88f22329abc00128@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com> <CAH51uSdK_BHgFKXzpp2XJ4H9fEqkkLynFLjV5PTn6Y8EHSFz-g@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2E940C1@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com> <0c7b995c954746b8a58ae8a3399588ba@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2E96D65@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com> <27173.1488308037@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2EA4DDB@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com> <07A8771E-0D92-40B2-B880-50EE58D816A1@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <07A8771E-0D92-40B2-B880-50EE58D816A1@tzi.org>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.191.175]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.58B68CB1.0251, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 6fb0175b8f406722e4ad34b78e99510c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-bootstrap/Ie8SdU-2Mq27z4uJqZgNu98vdcE>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "anima-bootstrap@ietf.org" <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>, peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>, "Panos Kampanakis \(pkampana\)" <pkampana@cisco.com>, "Kumar, Sandeep" <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?
X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <anima-bootstrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-bootstrap/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:56:25 -0000

Hi Carsten,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Bormann [mailto:cabo@tzi.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 4:51 PM
> To: Liubing (Leo)
> Cc: Michael Richardson; anima-bootstrap@ietf.org; peter van der Stok;
> Panos Kampanakis (pkampana); Kumar, Sandeep
> Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?
> 
> On 1 Mar 2017, at 04:46, Liubing (Leo) <leo.liubing@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > [Bing] I didn't quite followed the relative discussion. Is this because that
> CoAP is seldom supported by Non-IoT devices (e.g. telecom boxes)?
> 
> Well, ANIMA is rarely supported by Non-IoT devices either.
> So you implement it.
> (The afternoon you spend on implementing CoAP during that time is pretty
> much inconsequential in the big picture.)
[Bing] Sure:) 
I was just curious about why there might not be consensus as Michael mentioned.

Best regards,
Bing

> Grüße, Carsten