Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Anima] Call for agenda ANIMA @ IETF 97, Seoul, Korea

Michael Richardson <> Sat, 12 November 2016 02:50 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F10129422 for <>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:50:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2__HSpHwR6-5 for <>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5904F126D74 for <>; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF101F906; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 02:50:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by (Postfix, from userid 179) id CC1CA321D; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:50:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <>
To: "anima-bootstrap\" <>
In-reply-to: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
Comments: In-reply-to Kent Watsen <> message dated "Wed, 09 Nov 2016 18:44:09 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Attribution: mcr
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:50:07 +0900
Message-ID: <>
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "Max Pritikin \(pritikin\)" <>, Kent Watsen <>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Anima] Call for agenda ANIMA @ IETF 97, Seoul, Korea
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 02:50:13 -0000

Kent Watsen <> wrote:
    > I plan to present the voucher draft to the NETCONF WG, but to be
    > honest, that’s in part a discussion regarding which WG should pick it
    > up.  Right now the NETCONF chairs are okay with it, but it needs to be
    > confirmed by the WG.

Agreed.  I think NETCONF and ANIMA are both in Ops, so Benoit is the common
AD, so let him decide :-)  {can't check from airplane)

    > I could present voucher also to ANIMA, with Michael’s assist, if you
    > like.  I’m easily able to speak to the document itself, but I might not
    > have the best answers regarding how it ties into BRSKI.  Right now, the
    > BRSKI draft doesn’t reference it at all, so we’d have to walk people
    > thru its application to BRSKI...

Let's do that, I will put some slides together about state of BRSKI according
to the list below, and segway to your part.

(I seem to have enough space to open my laptop on the airplane. Amazing.
You won't get this until I land, of course)

new agenda:
 1) quickest BRSKI overview.
 2) recap of incoming/outgoing discussion (as short as I can make it, it's a
     bike-shed question)
 3) audit token, nonce-full/nonce-less versions
 4) online view, offline view
 5) .. into ownership voucher