Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Anima] Concise version of BRSKI

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Tue, 23 May 2017 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B414129B57; Tue, 23 May 2017 07:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gGqePF4ljwxP; Tue, 23 May 2017 07:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8308D129A8F; Tue, 23 May 2017 07:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:77]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AE458C4AF; Tue, 23 May 2017 16:28:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 6E64EB0C097; Tue, 23 May 2017 16:28:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 16:28:24 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: "Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com>
Cc: "consultancy@vanderstok.org" <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, anima-bootstrap <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>, Anima WG <anima@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170523142824.GA18931@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <21915.1490916584@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <6168.1491913071@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <3EB7EB76-B8F6-4A64-918E-307C4F8B20E8@cisco.com> <4cb3eef653ebc2edec8160efb63e5cf6@xs4all.nl> <FE9AE6C0-F392-46F3-84F9-8A51D8F144A4@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FE9AE6C0-F392-46F3-84F9-8A51D8F144A4@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-bootstrap/WGzsgQqOsE0QsXByHT6WuQ8Ys7Y>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Anima] Concise version of BRSKI
X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <anima-bootstrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-bootstrap/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 14:28:30 -0000

It is quite frustrating to see the bootstrap draft be handled in a way that is impossible
to track:

- it would have been better not to crearte anothrer branch that you can only be aware 
  of by having seen this email
- If you use a new branch, it would be great if you would have updated the IETF anima bootstrap wiki page
  with this information.
- for the sake of the non-git experts amongst us, it would be great to also indicate some
  command how to retrieve this branch. I for once tried:

  git clone -b concise https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap

  and that totally did not work.
  So as of right now i am lost in how i should review this version of the document.

Toerless

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:07:18PM +0000, Max Pritikin (pritikin) wrote:
> 
> Peter,
> 
> The current text is wordy and repetitive and says things more than once <grin>. Primary focus is to remove repetitive text, tighten remaining text, and consolidate normative statements. 
> 
> As an initial example the -05 draft has 3 main sections:
> 	architectural overview
> 	functional overview (contains design considerations discussions)
> 	protocol details
> The initial ???concise??? branch commit moves the functional overview to the appendix. Subsequent commits are resolving normative texts that were in there by moving needed bits back into the protocol discussion. You can follow along via the git repository here:
> 	https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/compare/concise
> 
> There was a comment that the design considerations are useful and might be appropriate to keep here or in another document. At the moment I don???t have a formulated position on that.  
> 
> - max
> 
> > On Apr 18, 2017, at 3:27 AM, peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>; wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Max,
> > 
> > excellent idea. I looked at the present version, and there is still a lot of text.
> > Where in the text do you want to reduce more? What is the end-objective?
> > And will this become the final document, or is it a study that will be used later for editing the final document?
> > 
> > Peter
> > 
> > Max Pritikin (pritikin) schreef op 2017-04-15 00:34:
> >> For those of you tracking the git repository please note the existence
> >> of a new branch. As warned I???m significantly reducing the text. This
> >> work is going on in the branch ???concise???.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Anima mailing list
> >> Anima@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima-bootstrap mailing list
> Anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de