Re: [Anima-bootstrap] notes from 3/3

"Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com> Mon, 07 March 2016 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <pritikin@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3D01CD8D4 for <anima-bootstrap@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:53:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfc.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.41]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36f8cDU2qX-O for <anima-bootstrap@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:52:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3446F1CD8D3 for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:52:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3190; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1457376779; x=1458586379; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=M9ezbQA81YNJ3e1e/091stQWo1Yaetam5xemUs5hE+w=; b=Q3KUhpbAxEmtHlRpdliP1wO2R61TixqVNac+oYuhppBFJYNFWh521y3U HhOUOEaIys7FH1mJwM8+3lmU7Vbwih24xP0dB7fU5R8LNMZyLRScHwLs8 n5rGs/G/lzub6DYOBYF6Fc9DLLEIYzj1sU5fzx46sIKD+voePTVi4xZxL s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ArAgDkzd1W/5ldJa1cgzpSbQa6OgENg?= =?us-ascii?q?WkXCoVuAhyBEDgUAQEBAQEBAWQcC4RBAQEBAwEBAQEgEToLBQsCAQgYAgImAgI?= =?us-ascii?q?CJQsVEAIECgQFiBwIDq9CjwwBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQERBHuHC4JOh?= =?us-ascii?q?DgYgmorgQ8FlyoBjWyBY40XhXmIWwEeAQFCg2RqiD9+AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,552,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="80354077"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Mar 2016 18:52:37 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (xch-rcd-012.cisco.com [173.37.102.22]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u27IqbVh026988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 7 Mar 2016 18:52:37 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) by XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (173.37.102.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 12:52:36 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-013.cisco.com ([173.36.7.23]) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com ([173.36.7.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 12:52:36 -0600
From: "Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com>
To: "consultancy@vanderstok.org" <consultancy@vanderstok.org>
Thread-Topic: [Anima-bootstrap] notes from 3/3
Thread-Index: AQHRdZhdnECu+CVVBk+iqQdA9QV8xZ9ODBaAgACyVQA=
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 18:52:36 +0000
Message-ID: <06CA559B-76A3-4E37-AB7B-42872496A9F7@cisco.com>
References: <FDA042A3-28EB-49BE-9441-1C58DFB41766@cisco.com> <46f36a603a0725ef5c318fef7a4d9a92@xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <46f36a603a0725ef5c318fef7a4d9a92@xs4all.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.99.106.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <9E61864206121B45A5FE6277D1B9638E@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-bootstrap/YFVEbRBEUHk_USOkWZkbVraVo3k>
Cc: "anima-bootstrap@ietf.org" <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] notes from 3/3
X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <anima-bootstrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-bootstrap/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 18:53:00 -0000

Thanks Peter. I think I have this covered in the new text I just pushed to the git repository. 

- max

> On Mar 7, 2016, at 1:14 AM, peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi Max,
> 
> Not having the section in front of me I do a guess about the number.
> 
> My remark was to put in section 3.2? a phrase like:
> The new node sends an unprotected link-local CoAP request to the proxy. The proxy forwards the request over a protect IP-IP connection to the registrar.
> 
> Current;y, there is text about proxy and registrar but not on new node.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Peter
> 
> Max Pritikin (pritikin) schreef op 2016-03-03 23:02:
>> raw notes from the call today. Plan is to update doc as per these and
>> push the -02 (to obtain more formal feedback) early next week.
>> thx,
>> - max
>> s1.2
>> intended to call out that fragmentation issues make this fail on
>> deployments that can’t handle that. such as the LLN that SHOULD NOT.
>> it isn’t the protocol -- its the necessary size of the messages.
>> section 3.2.3
>> pull
>> move I-D reference to the top of section.
>> s3
>> need text indicating that communication between proxy and registar is
>> up to the proxy and the registrar.
>> we need to state the ‘mandatory to implement’ protocol.
>> need 3.2.x “how proxy discovers registrar needs to be indicated”
>> 	need an equivalent statement about how the registrar responds to that.
>> need to make it clear that the proxy is not terminating the CoAP connection
>> we maintain 3.2.1 and 3.22 so we support HTTP and CoAP and we’ll need
>> to add sections in 5.x how to encapsulate into CoAP with block
>> transfer.
>> Add section and text w/ pointers about how to use CoAP and block
>> transfer. black transfer should be going into last call.
>> 3.2.2.
>> the registrar MUST accept the CONNECT.
>> 3.2.x
>> need section describing how the proxy discovers the register
>> 	using GRASP is possibility
>> 	the proxy will discover the address of the registrar through reference
>> 	(prefix allocation document might provide a more complex example.
>> ours should be easier).
>> _______________________________________________
>> Anima-bootstrap mailing list
>> Anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap