Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Anima] Call for agenda ANIMA @ IETF 97, Seoul, Korea

"Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <> Thu, 27 October 2016 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC88129735 for <>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.951
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id afH7975XgqMc for <>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EFEB129721 for <>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=21764; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1477595840; x=1478805440; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=jMFvClRt2L14QZuvn47zVtfn0+LAqNMtSJhp4l5/t/s=; b=DHc1vmkdKK8Y1wguOG4HikXIUtxz8tzshqcnc/5aEdrjuiYSF3J/Y02i /j1uPEJvd2jn+cj5lVBiVNgxukg6haLdM9Nf2+SXC37q9fWNwhRwdduH3 GXUFZTTxts4VgMNh4sT+d3HvVYUdSVJ+zqJ806Uv9hVQSdl6QbbQ+SDWO 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,553,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="162381955"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Oct 2016 19:17:19 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9RJHJUm021728 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:17:19 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:17:18 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:17:18 -0500
From: "Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <>
To: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [Anima] Call for agenda ANIMA @ IETF 97, Seoul, Korea
Thread-Index: AdIutH58Odwhi0GhRUu6/2nVO6atAwB/Cc8A
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:17:18 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5D480740DE734C8C95EB554CEE931C16ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Anima] Call for agenda ANIMA @ IETF 97, Seoul, Korea
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:17:23 -0000

Since I won’t be able to be in Seoul I won’t be able to present. But I suspect we should have a slot for presenting an update. Michael Richardson, will you be presenting? Should you chip in for the agenda slot?

- max

On Oct 25, 2016, at 5:39 AM, Sheng Jiang <<>> wrote:

Hi, all anima,

We have requested two sessions of 2 hour + 2 hour for the ANIMA WG meeting for IETF-97 (Seoul, Korea) and are starting to collect agenda items for these sessions. Same with previous IETF meetings, we do not reserve the second session for non-charter work items. It says the charter work item would have priority. We will only discuss non-charter work items till we finish charter work items. However, since we are approaching our milestones, some of our chartered work item may be mature and request less discussion time. So, hopefully, we could have more time for discussion of non-charter work items. As normal, the priority among these non-charter work items would be: these that have active discussion in mail list, then these have submitted drafts, and topics without drafts.

Please send us (anima-chairs at<>) requests for time slot by November 3rd, Thursday and include:
Name of time slot:
Name of draft(s):
Time requested:
Presenter name(s):
Brief description of what issues need discussing and what you hope to
accomplish by presenting (please focus on open issues, rather than a
status update):

More details about the IETF 97, Seoul, Korea can be found at:

Again, presenters and draft authors please invoke active discussions in the ANIMA list. We have very limited time for each topic in the face-to-face meeting. Mail list is a very good place to discuss and reach consensus on technical issues.

Best regards,

Toerless & Sheng

Anima mailing list<>