Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] Constrained Environment PKI enrollment

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 06 June 2016 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A64012D528; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AOS5qbpBEA_O; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4602112D0ED; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098EF2015D; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:38:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B7D638BF; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 14:31:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se>, anima-bootstrap@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAF2hCbbtW4rbaB0ksrRdLFgvYZXRMc2bgE=93T5pf_Cdt2S+gg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN9CcB8x8WE-UfX=JxQb2amoDo2MKsCk2GKdXh9-70eJTiM8Gw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF2hCbbtW4rbaB0ksrRdLFgvYZXRMc2bgE=93T5pf_Cdt2S+gg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 14:31:05 -0400
Message-ID: <14558.1465237865@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-bootstrap/n9bnsLneajnDOZV_6CzKZqbRkeE>
Cc: Julien Vermillard <jvermillard@gmail.com>, Shahid Raza <aazaan@gmail.com>, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] [Ace] Constrained Environment PKI enrollment
X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <anima-bootstrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-bootstrap/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 18:31:08 -0000

Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se> wrote:
    > The company I previously worked for where looking into adopting EST for
    > this purpose, the benefit of EST compared to cmp or scep was that it
    > defined the process for server side generated keys, which could be
    > beneficial if key generation would be to cumbersome for the device or
    > if you don't trust the
    > device to generate a "good" key.

Hi, these are definitely important considerations.
I would invite you to read the ANIMA bootstrap keying documents, and
possibly join the design team.
At this point I believe the bootstrap is out of scope for ACE.

We are considering whether to use OSCOAP for 6tisch though.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-