IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?

"Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com> Tue, 10 January 2017 01:11 UTC

Return-Path: <pkampana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE101299CD for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 17:11:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9R0HjYx7Jdv5 for <anima-bootstrap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 17:11:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7E0D1299CA for <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 17:11:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13424; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1484010710; x=1485220310; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=OoS7M5vhWD6uR/CYY8OGhc5K0giEUU4uOXr3GUIePv0=; b=cdXTcYAqJtiWG5Io8x/M6VSxzVSgQGo7yGcAXcOFS9Tnwsq5M1dJ1b3+ 9ps0pVAHpiZNDgJS2BiMEJLRQ9A2mc3GaJmMSuQOESNzItNu82L1P89EE vJPVWMAiE/pwcMUnxTNzE1pcu4i7CHv7ST04dq5BJXotNXDE0MAfgae8E 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DvAgDRM3RY/4QNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgnFJAQEBAQEfX4EMB4NInC+PfIUrggqGIgIagU9AEwECAQEBAQEBAWMohGgBAQEEIwpMEAIBCBEEAQEoAwICAjAUCQgCBAENBQiIaLAbgiWKJAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2GRYRhhHyCUoJeBZUchgABkUOQZZJUASEBNUJ+FYZic4dZgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,341,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="369116559"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 10 Jan 2017 01:11:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com (xch-rcd-010.cisco.com [173.37.102.20]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v0A1BnZi017720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 10 Jan 2017 01:11:49 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) by XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com (173.37.102.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:11:48 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:11:48 -0600
From: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>
To: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>, "anima-bootstrap@ietf.org" <anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: CoAP mandatory?
Thread-Index: AQHSZm3nQnBMlSwND0q2wO31P4mDwqEw7T2Q
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 01:11:48 +0000
Message-ID: <0c7b995c954746b8a58ae8a3399588ba@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com>
References: <6525c5f0b6e040b683ccd9c43b1c5e2f@VI1PR9003MB0237.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com> <14831.1481139454@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <d9aba3a07d14400f88f22329abc00128@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com> <CAH51uSdK_BHgFKXzpp2XJ4H9fEqkkLynFLjV5PTn6Y8EHSFz-g@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2E940C1@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2E940C1@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.247.23]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0c7b995c954746b8a58ae8a3399588baXCHALN010ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-bootstrap/o-rzn9Zcog50bUeXUHkTTUw-FkU>
Cc: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>, "Kumar, Sandeep" <sandeep.kumar@philips.com>
Subject: Re: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?
X-BeenThere: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the bootstrap design team of the ANIMA WG <anima-bootstrap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-bootstrap/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-bootstrap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-bootstrap>, <mailto:anima-bootstrap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 01:11:52 -0000

Hi Bing,
I can’t answer your question on behalf of the BRSKI authors, but I wanted to share that we are starting a new draft to describe how BRSKI’s section 5.7.5 (ESToCOAP) will be done. We hope to get it adopted in ACE WG.
Regards,
Panos


From: Anima-bootstrap [mailto:anima-bootstrap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Liubing (Leo)
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 4:35 AM
To: anima-bootstrap@ietf.org
Subject: [Anima-bootstrap] CoAP mandatory?

Hi Dear all,

The 04 draft has an editor note:

“ [[EDNOTE: The
   choice of CoAP as the mandatory to implement protocol rather than
   HTTP maximizes code reuse on the smallest of devices.  Unfortunately
   this means this document will have to include the EST over CoAP
   details as additional sections.  The alternative is to make 'HTTPS
   proxy' method the mandatory to implement and provide a less friendly
   environment for the smallest of devices.  This is a decision we'll
   have to see addressed by the broader team.]]
”
Does this open question already have a final conclusion?
Thanks.

Best regards,
Bing

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email