IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima-signaling] GRASP issue 51: Flooded objectives

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 24 August 2016 03:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima-signaling@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima-signaling@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B55A12D597 for <anima-signaling@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V-_af4jLRqbA for <anima-signaling@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 069B012D108 for <anima-signaling@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (cl-27.chi-03.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2604:8800:100:1a::2]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437A21F906; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 03:17:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id AD1406070B; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 23:17:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <e46a2864-68b2-1d10-0891-a0aa5ee8f34d@gmail.com>
References: <47c158b3-92f4-8a36-1bc1-c5c19afdc6b3@gmail.com> <20160801085529.GT21039@cisco.com> <97815aec-a36f-8dda-6798-eb0c1c5eda17@gmail.com> <20160805083457.GH21039@cisco.com> <f541b926-cde7-db52-a0fa-226761d0c3c8@gmail.com> <20160808140326.GA6295@cisco.com> <a09050d0-ce14-d628-13b6-28e73a79d238@gmail.com> <20160809063909.GZ21039@cisco.com> <9e003de0-8351-650c-dca7-50472a0570ee@gmail.com> <20160810064103.GM21039@cisco.com> <dceeb644-5c37-5472-ee44-9fa2134cf673@gmail.com> <e46a2864-68b2-1d10-0891-a0aa5ee8f34d@gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> message dated "Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:41:08 +1200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 23:17:22 -0400
Message-ID: <18335.1472008642@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima-signaling/AMr_fMcaX3zxZD4ghWO6mJD7Nbo>
Cc: Anima signaling DT <anima-signaling@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Anima-signaling] GRASP issue 51: Flooded objectives
X-BeenThere: anima-signaling@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the signaling design team of the ANIMA WG <anima-signaling.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima-signaling>, <mailto:anima-signaling-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima-signaling/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima-signaling@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-signaling-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-signaling>, <mailto:anima-signaling-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 03:17:30 -0000

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
    > While I'm there, should I add an optional TTL field to the Discovery
    > Response too? It would make the Flood and Discovery Response messages
    > essentially identical, and if it's optional there will be no
    > unnecessary overhead.

I think this is a good idea.


-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                  (Camping this week!)

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email